diff for duplicates of <51F7590B.4020705@ti.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 153133c..7be6fdf 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ On Tuesday 30 July 2013 11:31 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
 >>>>> so that's temporary. It might be better than to reintroduce the IDR in
 >>>>> musb_core.c.
 >>>>
->>>> that’s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s
+>>>> that?s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s
 >>>
 >>> right, but generic phy framework can handle everything just fine, the
 >>> only problem is that names are changing.
@@ -85,14 +85,9 @@ right. But the PHY device can be created in a different place from where the
 musb devices are created. And in the PHY framework, the PHY device should have
 the list of controller device (names) it can support (PHY framework does not
 maintain a separate list for binding like how we had in USB PHY library). e.g.
-http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such
+http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such
 cases how do we pass the device names. Also will the MUSB core device be
 created before twl4030-usb PHY device?
 
 Thanks
 Kishon
-
-_______________________________________________
-linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index a8fa284..e5674db 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,19 +5,10 @@
  "ref\020130729175413.GC4964@radagast\0"
  "ref\051F74BC8.7020903@ti.com\0"
  "ref\020130730060134.GD9155@radagast\0"
- "From\0Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind_phy\0"
+ "From\0kishon@ti.com (Kishon Vijay Abraham I)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind_phy\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:41:23 +0530\0"
- "To\0balbi@ti.com\0"
- "Cc\0linux@arm.linux.org.uk"
-  tony@atomide.com
-  gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
-  linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-  eballetbo@gmail.com
-  javier@dowhile0.org
-  linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi,\n"
@@ -92,7 +83,7 @@
  ">>>>> so that's temporary. It might be better than to reintroduce the IDR in\n"
  ">>>>> musb_core.c.\n"
  ">>>>\n"
- ">>>> that\342\200\231s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s\n"
+ ">>>> that?s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">>> right, but generic phy framework can handle everything just fine, the\n"
  ">>> only problem is that names are changing.\n"
@@ -107,16 +98,11 @@
  "musb devices are created. And in the PHY framework, the PHY device should have\n"
  "the list of controller device (names) it can support (PHY framework does not\n"
  "maintain a separate list for binding like how we had in USB PHY library). e.g.\n"
- "http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such\n"
+ "http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such\n"
  "cases how do we pass the device names. Also will the MUSB core device be\n"
  "created before twl4030-usb PHY device?\n"
  "\n"
  "Thanks\n"
- "Kishon\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
+ Kishon
 
-c71aa48100b5cfb425022544f25d450853fc339f824bd69201ffa6c29514d37b
+ed7e3c0ed0f778672f5b7b06ca1f5dca8a4aebe73dae1a431d239dcece651923
