diff for duplicates of <51F75C40.4060406@ti.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index bdd6dd2..371146b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ On Tuesday 30 July 2013 11:48 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
 >>>>>>> so that's temporary. It might be better than to reintroduce the IDR in
 >>>>>>> musb_core.c.
 >>>>>>
->>>>>> that’s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s
+>>>>>> that?s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s
 >>>>>
 >>>>> right, but generic phy framework can handle everything just fine, the
 >>>>> only problem is that names are changing.
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ On Tuesday 30 July 2013 11:48 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
 > 
 >> the list of controller device (names) it can support (PHY framework does not
 >> maintain a separate list for binding like how we had in USB PHY library). e.g.
->> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such
+>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such
 > 
 > this has nothing to do with $subject though. We talk about generic PHY
 > framework once all these PHY drivers are moved there :-)
@@ -80,8 +80,3 @@ platforms wont work after Generic PHY framework gets merged.
 
 Thanks
 Kishon
-
-_______________________________________________
-linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 8bfc0dd..c837c16 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -7,19 +7,10 @@
  "ref\020130730060134.GD9155@radagast\0"
  "ref\051F7590B.4020705@ti.com\0"
  "ref\020130730061830.GE9155@radagast\0"
- "From\0Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind_phy\0"
+ "From\0kishon@ti.com (Kishon Vijay Abraham I)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind_phy\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:55:04 +0530\0"
- "To\0balbi@ti.com\0"
- "Cc\0linux@arm.linux.org.uk"
-  tony@atomide.com
-  gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
-  linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-  eballetbo@gmail.com
-  javier@dowhile0.org
-  linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi,\n"
@@ -65,7 +56,7 @@
  ">>>>>>> so that's temporary. It might be better than to reintroduce the IDR in\n"
  ">>>>>>> musb_core.c.\n"
  ">>>>>>\n"
- ">>>>>> that\342\200\231s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s\n"
+ ">>>>>> that?s needed for generic phy framework anyway :-s\n"
  ">>>>>\n"
  ">>>>> right, but generic phy framework can handle everything just fine, the\n"
  ">>>>> only problem is that names are changing.\n"
@@ -84,7 +75,7 @@
  "> \n"
  ">> the list of controller device (names) it can support (PHY framework does not\n"
  ">> maintain a separate list for binding like how we had in USB PHY library). e.g.\n"
- ">> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such\n"
+ ">> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such\n"
  "> \n"
  "> this has nothing to do with $subject though. We talk about generic PHY\n"
  "> framework once all these PHY drivers are moved there :-)\n"
@@ -103,11 +94,6 @@
  "platforms wont work after Generic PHY framework gets merged.\n"
  "\n"
  "Thanks\n"
- "Kishon\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
+ Kishon
 
-19c1185bd81e852ae2185d71d206b0de7d4a8c1ee4caa3a36a94ddfc349afb16
+367ec3cb6728fae2435d4a16600be924cbc4d4e1c92708626c0a10f25ff1dc3e
