From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: OMAP baseline test results for v3.10-rc6 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:28:17 -0500 Message-ID: <51F821E1.3040808@ti.com> References: <20130625160243.GE22312@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <51C9F0A8.1050607@ti.com> <51CB4C20.3060306@ti.com> <51F66024.1030804@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:41501 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756523Ab3G3U2k (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:28:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Tom Rini , "Balbi, Felipe" , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Hiremath, Vaibhav" On 07/30/2013 03:23 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Do you know if anyone ever got serial cold-booting working well for, say, > OMAP3 and OMAP4 chips? I had done configuration header based OMAP3 boot[1] once upon a time, but serial boot straight to kernel, we need a second that gives control there.. could be done, have'nt heard it done + I dont directly see a customer usage model for it ("ROI for investment of time") - so doubt any investment was done. CH was the closest I could get to avoiding bootloaders in it's entirety. but the level of interest fell off when there was no viable usage model for the same. [1] http://marc.info/?t=127232401100003&r=1&w=2 -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:28:17 -0500 Subject: OMAP baseline test results for v3.10-rc6 In-Reply-To: References: <20130625160243.GE22312@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <51C9F0A8.1050607@ti.com> <51CB4C20.3060306@ti.com> <51F66024.1030804@ti.com> Message-ID: <51F821E1.3040808@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/30/2013 03:23 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Do you know if anyone ever got serial cold-booting working well for, say, > OMAP3 and OMAP4 chips? I had done configuration header based OMAP3 boot[1] once upon a time, but serial boot straight to kernel, we need a second that gives control there.. could be done, have'nt heard it done + I dont directly see a customer usage model for it ("ROI for investment of time") - so doubt any investment was done. CH was the closest I could get to avoiding bootloaders in it's entirety. but the level of interest fell off when there was no viable usage model for the same. [1] http://marc.info/?t=127232401100003&r=1&w=2 -- Regards, Nishanth Menon