From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Wang Subject: Re: Blueprint: inline data support (step 2) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:34:22 +0800 Message-ID: <51F9206E.9040604@ubuntukylin.com> References: <51F855D9.6070306@ubuntukylin.com> <51F857B5.5070409@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from m59-178.qiye.163.com ([123.58.178.59]:52249 "EHLO m59-178.qiye.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752097Ab3GaOea (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:34:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51F857B5.5070409@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Sure, just being busy with some other things, I will post it before the summit. Cheers, Li Wang On 07/31/2013 08:17 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice to have URLs to the current implementation and the benchmark results you got in the blueprint. > > http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/Inline_data_support_%28Step_2%29 > > Cheers > > On 31/07/2013 02:10, Li Wang wrote: >> We have worked out a preliminary implementation for inline data support, and observed obvious speed up for small file access. >> >> The step 2 will focus on (1) Try to make things simpler to eliminate the state of a file half-inlined; (2) To efficiently deal with the share write or read/write; (3) Protocal backword compatability >> >> We submitted a blueprint for this, anyone interested is welcome to join the discussion. >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >