From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gordan Bobic Subject: Re: Bug: Limitation of <=2GB RAM in domU persists with 4.3.0 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:36:03 +0100 Message-ID: <51F96723.4040601@bobich.net> References: <51EF04D8.1090600@bobich.net> <20130724140813.GH2518@phenom.dumpdata.com> <2aa84a31b7b17c2ea6d8483a281ad3f5@mail.shatteredsilicon.net> <20130724160639.GB5804@phenom.dumpdata.com> <8426aecf79e7f55c21bbe259014591a2@mail.shatteredsilicon.net> <20130724163102.GA6308@phenom.dumpdata.com> <51F051F1.5050806@bobich.net> <51F19D11.1090200@bobich.net> <51F1A54D.6070906@bobich.net> <1374798084.10269.2.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <4e207d63809542544ebe45866e746e91@mail.shatteredsilicon.net> <51F94FB2.9060803@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51F94FB2.9060803@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: George Dunlap , Andrew Bobulsky , Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/31/2013 06:56 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 31/07/13 18:53, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: >>>> Now that is intereting - if this makes the memory holes the same between >>>> the guest and the host, does it also implicitly vBAR=pBAR? >>> >>> Another thing that occurred to me might be useful to check - it is >>> pretty easy to modify the BAR size on Nvidia cards. The defaults are >>> 64MB and 128MB for the two BARs. They can be made much, much larger, >>> and there is often advantage to enlarging them to at least be equal to >>> VRAM size. Soooooo... If I boost the BAR from 128MB to 2GB, being a >>> 64-bit BAR, it might make the BIOS do the sane thing and map it above >>> 4GB. With the other BAR also suitably enlarged and it being done on >>> the second GPU as well, there is no obvious option but to map them >>> above 4GB (unless the BIOS is broken, which it may well be, in >>> which case all bets are off). >>> >>> Which may just alleviate the memory issue if not completely fix >>> the problem. >>> >>> Will try this and see what happens. >> I believe XenServer has a patch that allows the toolstack (in this >> case xapi) to set the default size of the MMIO hole. Andrew, did that >> ever make it upstream? >> >> Unfortunately, it is unlikely to work with upstream qemu until we fix >> the memory relocation issue... >> > > I believe it did - the patch does not exist in our patch queue any more. Can anyone point me at the relevant commit / docs on this patch? Gordan