From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <51FA3587.3000801@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:16:39 +0200 From: Zdenek Kabelac MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1375197482-4824-1-git-send-email-christian@iwakd.de> <51F8CFDD.5060605@redhat.com> <573874159e2a0196c68f44d6b5dc334a@iwakd.de> <51F8FEB7.9050004@redhat.com> <51F94911.8080405@iwakd.de> <3b25d3821598bb4484b1eb9dde67b3e6@iwakd.de> In-Reply-To: <3b25d3821598bb4484b1eb9dde67b3e6@iwakd.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] lvremove: perform retry logic also on -real subvolume for snapshots Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Cc: Christian Seiler Dne 1.8.2013 11:19, Christian Seiler napsal(a): > Hi again, > > so I tried to use the current git version of LVM to see if I could > reproduce the problem, and I couldn't, even with Debian's udev rules. The problem with Debian is it's shipped with non-upstream patches which are changing whole udev synchronization - and unfortunately they are not correct and Debian maintainer is somehow nonresponsive here. (At least the latest unstable package have been using those udev monitoring extentsions). > Nevertheless, I think it might be a good idea to still apply my patch Nope. They would mask problems - the code should already handle your case at different level. Anyway - before reporting any udev synchronization problem - always check with upstream git and udev rules first - since the Debian version is usually significantly changed in this area.... Zdenek