All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <51FC11FF.4060604@wwwdotorg.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 2b8794c..9457b83 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ On 08/02/2013 03:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
 >> +};
 >> +
 >> +/* Device with nRESET pin connected to GPIO5_0 */
->> +sii902x at 39 {
+>> +sii902x@39 {
 >> +	/* ... */
 >> +	resets = <&sii902x_reset>; /* active-low GPIO5_0, 10 ms delay */
 >> +};
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ sense.
 > I think this should look more like the below:
 > 
 > /* Device with nRESET pin connected to GPIO5_0 */
-> sii902x at 39 {
+> sii902x@39 {
 > 	/* named for the actual input line */
 > 	nreset-gpios = <&gpio5 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
 > 	/* 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index d7df6e5..3db5f42 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,9 +1,20 @@
  "ref\01374139586-6344-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de\0"
  "ref\020130802092823.GA2884@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com\0"
- "From\0swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v10] reset: Add driver for gpio-controlled reset pins\0"
+ "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v10] reset: Add driver for gpio-controlled reset pins\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:09:35 -0600\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>"
+  Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
+  Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
+  Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
+  Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
+  Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
+  Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
+  Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
+  devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+ " Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 08/02/2013 03:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:\n"
@@ -45,7 +56,7 @@
  ">> +};\n"
  ">> +\n"
  ">> +/* Device with nRESET pin connected to GPIO5_0 */\n"
- ">> +sii902x at 39 {\n"
+ ">> +sii902x@39 {\n"
  ">> +\t/* ... */\n"
  ">> +\tresets = <&sii902x_reset>; /* active-low GPIO5_0, 10 ms delay */\n"
  ">> +};\n"
@@ -102,7 +113,7 @@
  "> I think this should look more like the below:\n"
  "> \n"
  "> /* Device with nRESET pin connected to GPIO5_0 */\n"
- "> sii902x at 39 {\n"
+ "> sii902x@39 {\n"
  "> \t/* named for the actual input line */\n"
  "> \tnreset-gpios = <&gpio5 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;\n"
  "> \t/* \n"
@@ -116,4 +127,4 @@
  "If we decide to ignore the case where the reset signal isn't driven by a\n"
  GPIO, yes, the above binding does look better.
 
-43f9355194cfb45aabd9ef253c98e9f40539203aee54ae31057fb6feb11c4b6b
+2b5f55bf0aed93a68513823dd2e4fabcd20eccb868dfdf3029bd7025c502d491

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.