All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vaughan <vaughan.cao@oracle.com>
To: dgilbert@interlog.com
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>,
	JBottomley@parallels.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:19:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FF0BC0.5020702@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FC9449.4060906@interlog.com>

On 08/03/2013 01:25 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 13-08-01 01:01 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> On 13-07-22 01:03 PM, Jörn Engel wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 July 2013 12:40:29 +0800, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is a race when open sg with O_EXCL flag. Also a race may
>>>> happen between
>>>> sg_open and sg_remove.
>>>>
>>>> Changes from v4:
>>>>   * [3/4] use ERR_PTR series instead of adding another parameter in
>>>> sg_add_sfp
>>>>   * [4/4] fix conflict for cherry-pick from v3.
>>>>
>>>> Changes from v3:
>>>>   * release o_sem in sg_release(), not in sg_remove_sfp().
>>>>   * not set exclude with sfd_lock held.
>>>>
>>>> Vaughan Cao (4):
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device
>>>>      locking
>>>>
>>>>   drivers/scsi/sg.c | 178
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>>>   1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Patchset looks good to me, although I didn't test it on hardware yet.
>>> Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
>>>
>>> James, care to pick this up?
>>
>> Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
>>
>> Tested O_EXCL with multiple processes and threads; passed.
>> sg driver prior to this patch had "leaky" O_EXCL logic
>> according to the same test. Block device passed.
>>
>> James, could you clean this up:
>>    drivers/scsi/sg.c:242:6: warning: unused variable ‘res’
>> [-Wunused-variable]
>
> Further testing suggests this patch on the sg driver is
> broken, so I'll rescind my ack.
>
> The case it is broken for is when a device is opened
> without O_EXCL. Now if, while it is open, a second
> thread/process tries to open the same device O_EXCL
> then IMO the second open should fail with EBUSY.
>
> My testing shows that O_EXCL opens properly deflect
> other O_EXCL opens.
Hi  Doug,

My test don't have this issue. The routine is something as below:

I start three opens without O_EXCL, wait 30s each, and open with
O_EXCL|O_NONBLOCK, it failed with EBUSY.
And I also call myopen with/without O_EXCL many times in background at
the same time, and the test is passed. I don't know why it failed in
your test.

Usage: myopen [-e][-n][-d delay] -f file
      -e: exclude
      -n: nonblock
      -d: delay N seconds and then close.

[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[1] 3417
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[2] 3418
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[3] 3419
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# cat /proc/scsi/sg/debug
max_active_device=6(origin 1)
 def_reserved_size=32768
 >>> device=sg5 scsi5 chan=0 id=1 lun=0   em=0 sg_tablesize=55 excl=0
   FD(1): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(2): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(3): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active

[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen -e -n  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[4] 3422
[3422:3351] /dev/sg5:exclude: Device or resource busy

[4]+  Exit 1                  ./myopen -e -n -f /dev/sg5 -d 30

[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# cat /proc/scsi/sg/debug
max_active_device=6(origin 1)
 def_reserved_size=32768
 >>> device=sg5 scsi5 chan=0 id=1 lun=0   em=0 sg_tablesize=55 excl=0
   FD(1): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(2): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(3): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# cat /proc/scsi/sg/debug
[1]   Done                    ./myopen -f /dev/sg5 -d 30
[2]-  Done                    ./myopen -f /dev/sg5 -d 30
[3]+  Done                    ./myopen -f /dev/sg5 -d 30


>
> BTW the standard block driver (e.g. /dev/sdc) is broken
> in exactly the same way, according to my tests.
>
> Doug Gilbert
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-05  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-05  9:18 [PATCH] sg: atomize check and set sdp->exclude in sg_open vaughan
2013-06-05 13:27 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-05 16:16   ` vaughan
2013-06-05 15:41     ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-06  7:19       ` vaughan
2013-06-06  7:29         ` vaughan
2013-06-06  7:29           ` vaughan
2013-06-17 13:10       ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition when do exclusive open vaughan
2013-06-26  1:37         ` vaughan
2013-07-05  1:59           ` vaughan
2013-07-05  1:59             ` vaughan
2013-07-05 17:39         ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-05 17:39           ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-06 17:24           ` vaughan
2013-07-07 19:53             ` [PATCH v3 " vaughan
2013-07-15 20:37               ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 1/4] [SCSI] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:19                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-19 21:19                       ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] [SCSI] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:19                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] [SCSI] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:24                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-22  3:39                       ` [PATCH v5 " Vaughan Cao
     [not found]                       ` <CAMvaAQnFy0WiXHaNtAB1KPLK-7yj1AHh=_Pw4MBm0=_ecpoAoQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-22 16:52                         ` [PATCH v4 " Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] [SCSI] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:26                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-22  3:41                       ` [PATCH v5 " Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                   ` [PATCH v5 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 1/4] [SCSI] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28  4:00                       ` James Bottomley
2013-08-28 10:07                         ` [PATCH v6 0/4][SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 1/4] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:26                             ` James Bottomley
2013-08-29  2:00                               ` [PATCH v7 0/4][SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 2/4] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 3/4] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 4/4] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 2/4] [SCSI] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 3/4] [SCSI] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 4/4] [SCSI] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22 17:03                     ` [PATCH v5 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Jörn Engel
2013-07-22 17:03                       ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-25 15:32                       ` vaughan
2013-07-25 15:32                         ` vaughan
2013-07-25 20:33                         ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-07-25 20:33                           ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-07-31  4:40                           ` vaughan
2013-08-01  5:01                       ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-03  5:25                         ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-05  2:19                           ` vaughan [this message]
2013-08-05 20:52                             ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-05 20:52                               ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-13  2:46                               ` vaughan
2013-08-13  3:16                                 ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-27  8:16                                   ` vaughan
2013-08-27 13:13                                     ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-28  1:50                                       ` vaughan
2013-07-15 17:25             ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition when do exclusive open Jörn Engel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51FF0BC0.5020702@oracle.com \
    --to=vaughan.cao@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.