All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: Do not notify virtqueue if no element was pushed back.
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:07:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FF956B.3060909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FF9130.3030201@redhat.com>

On 05/08/2013 14:49, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 08/05/13 10:18, Gal Hammer wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> index da417c7..0d38b4b 100644
>> --- a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> +++ b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ static void do_flush_queued_data(VirtIOSerialPort *port, VirtQueue *vq,
>>                                    VirtIODevice *vdev)
>>   {
>>       VirtIOSerialPortClass *vsc;
>> +    bool elem_pushed = false;
>>
>>       assert(port);
>>       assert(virtio_queue_ready(vq));
>> @@ -145,9 +146,12 @@ static void do_flush_queued_data(VirtIOSerialPort *port, VirtQueue *vq,
>>               break;
>>           }
>>           virtqueue_push(vq, &port->elem, 0);
>> +        elem_pushed = true;
>>           port->elem.out_num = 0;
>>       }
>> -    virtio_notify(vdev, vq);
>> +    if (elem_pushed) {
>> +        virtio_notify(vdev, vq);
>> +    }
>>   }
>>
>>   static void flush_queued_data(VirtIOSerialPort *port)
>>
>
> I could be missing something, but it looks good to me.

Thanks.

> BTW the subject should say: "virtio-serial: ...", not generic "virtio: ...".

OK. I can change that.

> How did you catch this? Is this a performance problem, or did it expose
> a guest driver bug? (The guest driver should be prepared for spurious
> wakeups.)

I had a bug in the Windows' driver that caused a buffer duplication when 
the char device didn't read the whole message. It was found when working 
with SPICE client over WAN (i.e. slow connection) and trying to 
copy&paste a large image.

The driver was fixed. However I still think that this is needed although 
I'm not sure if there is a major performance penalty because of this 
redundant notification.

     Gal.

> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-05 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-05  8:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: Do not notify virtqueue if no element was pushed back Gal Hammer
2013-08-05 11:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 12:07   ` Gal Hammer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51FF956B.3060909@redhat.com \
    --to=ghammer@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.