From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
To: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@gmail.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 23:24:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5200180C.6060604@arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FFD913.1090301@gmail.com>
Hi Albert, Neil,
I just submitted a new patch series; patch 3/5 integrates your 2nd case
as a new unit test and 4/5 should fix it.
However @Neil: I am not yet entirely happy with this solution. AFAICS
there is a possible race condition here, if a disk fails and mdadm -CR
is called to create a new array before the metadata reflecting the
failure is written to disk. If a disk failure happens in one array,
mdmon will call reconcile_failed() to propagate the failure to other
already known arrays in the same container, by writing "faulty" to the
sysfs state attribute. It can't do that for a new container though.
I thought that process_update() may need to check the kernel state of
array members against meta data state when a new VD configuration record
is received, but that's impossible because we can't call open() on the
respective sysfs files. It could be done in prepare_update(), but that
would require major changes, I wanted to ask you first.
Another option would be changing manage_new(). But we don't seem to have
a suitable metadata handler method to pass the meta data state to the
manager....
Ideas?
Regards
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-01 19:30 Bugreport ddf rebuild problems Albert Pauw
2013-08-01 19:09 ` Martin Wilck
[not found] ` <CAGkViCFT0+qm9YAnAJM7JGgVg0RTJi8=HAYDTMs-mfhXinqdcg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-01 21:13 ` Martin Wilck
2013-08-01 22:09 ` Martin Wilck
2013-08-01 22:37 ` Martin Wilck
2013-08-03 9:43 ` Albert Pauw
2013-08-04 9:47 ` Albert Pauw
2013-08-05 16:55 ` Albert Pauw
2013-08-05 21:24 ` Martin Wilck [this message]
2013-08-06 0:16 ` NeilBrown
2013-08-06 21:26 ` Martin Wilck
2013-08-06 21:37 ` Patches related to current discussion mwilck
2013-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] tests/10ddf-fail-spare: more sophisticated result checks mwilck
2013-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] tests/10ddf-fail-create-race: test handling of fail/create race mwilck
2013-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] DDF: ddf_open_new: check device status for new subarray mwilck
2013-08-06 21:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts mwilck
2013-08-08 0:44 ` NeilBrown
2013-08-08 7:31 ` Martin Wilck
2013-08-07 18:07 ` Bugreport ddf rebuild problems Albert Pauw
2013-08-08 0:40 ` NeilBrown
[not found] <CAGkViCHPvbmcehFvACBKVFFCw+DdnjqvK2uNGmvKrFki+n9n-Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-05 6:21 ` NeilBrown
2013-08-05 7:17 ` Albert Pauw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5200180C.6060604@arcor.de \
--to=mwilck@arcor.de \
--cc=albert.pauw@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.