From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:23:16 +0800
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: free path in
	ocfs2_remove_inode_range()
In-Reply-To: <51FB7876.1010506@huawei.com>
References: <51FB7876.1010506@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <52009654.6080006@oracle.com>
List-Id: <ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com

On 08/02/2013 05:14 PM, Younger Liu wrote:

> In ocfs2_remove_inode_range(), there is a memory leak.
> The variable path has allocated memory with ocfs2_new_path_from_et(), 
> but it is not free.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Younger Liu <younger.liu@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/file.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index 833a09b..2d1a227 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -1796,6 +1796,7 @@ static int ocfs2_remove_inode_range(struct inode *inode,
>  	ocfs2_truncate_cluster_pages(inode, byte_start, byte_len);
>  
>  out:
> +	ocfs2_free_path(path);
>  	ocfs2_schedule_truncate_log_flush(osb, 1);
>  	ocfs2_run_deallocs(osb, &dealloc);

This patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>

BTW, I found another similar problem at: ocfs2/move_extent.c->__ocfs2_move_extent()
with a simple `grep` against the source tree, will post a patch to fix it, would
you like to help review?

Thanks,
-Jeff