All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Arthur Chunqi Li <yzt356@gmail.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:18:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5200B149.80601@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130806080051.GB8218@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3987 bytes --]

On 2013-08-06 10:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-08-06 09:51, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2013-08-05 13:40, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:27:33PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recent KVM, since http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kvm/2010/5/2/6261577
>>>>>>> switch the EFER MSR when EPT is used and the host and guest have different
>>>>>>> NX bits. So if we add support for nested EPT (L1 guest using EPT to run L2)
>>>>>>> and want to be able to run recent KVM as L1, we need to allow L1 to use this
>>>>>>> EFER switching feature.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To do this EFER switching, KVM uses VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER if available,
>>>>>>> and if it isn't, it uses the generic VM_ENTRY/EXIT_MSR_LOAD. This patch adds
>>>>>>> support for the former (the latter is still unsupported).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nested entry and exit emulation (prepare_vmcs_02 and load_vmcs12_host_state,
>>>>>>> respectively) already handled VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER correctly. So all
>>>>>>> that's left to do in this patch is to properly advertise this feature to L1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that vmcs12's VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER are emulated by L0, by using
>>>>>>> vmx_set_efer (which itself sets one of several vmcs02 fields), so we always
>>>>>>> support this feature, regardless of whether the host supports it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xinhao Xu <xinhao.xu@intel.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>>>> index e999dc7..27efa6a 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>>>>> @@ -2198,7 +2198,8 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
>>>>>>>  #else
>>>>>>>         nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high = 0;
>>>>>>>  #endif
>>>>>>> -       nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high |= VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
>>>>>>> +       nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high |= (VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR |
>>>>>>> +                                     VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER);
>>>>>> Gleb, why we don't need to check whether host supports
>>>>>> VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER here, as what you noted in my
>>>>>> VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PAT patch?
>>>>> Nested VMX completely emulates the capability.
>>>>
>>>> No, it doesn't. The values for host/guest are handled over via the
>>>> corresponding VMCS fields, physically, even though the actual loading is
>>>> emulated then. So we must not expose this feature unconditionally.
>>> Can you show me the code where it happens?
>>
>> When the guest writes to HOST/GUEST_IA32_EFER, we will store this in the
>> vmcs that will then become the active one on next L1/L2 entry, no?
>>
> Guest writes are stored in vmcs12 which is not HW vmcs, just a format
> kvm uses internally (see vmcs12_write_any). During guest entry vmcs02 
> is constructed from vmcs12 (see prepare_vmcs02) and this function does
> not access HOST/GUEST_IA32_EFER directly, it uses vmx_set_efer instead
> which takes care of things. Same function access GUEST_IA32_PAT directly
> though.

OK, right.

Is it also safe to write to any field of a shadow VMCS? That's currently
hypothetical, but what if the host supports shadowing but not EFER
loading? I don't see a technical reason but also no clear statement in
the SDM regarding this scenario.

Jan



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-06  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-05  8:07 [PATCH v7 00/15] Nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05 11:27   ` Arthur Chunqi Li
2013-08-05 11:40     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  7:47       ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  7:51         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  7:55           ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  8:00             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  8:18               ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-08-06  8:24                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05 11:48     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-05 12:05       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] nEPT: Fix cr3 handling in nested exit and entry Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] nEPT: Fix wrong test in kvm_set_cr3 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] nEPT: Move common code to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] nEPT: make guest's A/D bits depends on guest's paging mode Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] nEPT: Support shadow paging for guest paging without A/D bits Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] nEPT: Add EPT tables support to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] nEPT: Redefine EPT-specific link_shadow_page() Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] nEPT: correctly check if remote tlb flush is needed for shadowed EPT tables Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] nEPT: Add nEPT violation/misconfigration support Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  8:01   ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  9:00   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] nEPT: Nested INVEPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:53   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] nEPT: Advertise EPT to L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06  8:20   ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-06  9:02   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] nEPT: Some additional comments Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] nEPT: Miscelleneous cleanups Gleb Natapov
2013-08-07 14:07 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] Nested EPT Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5200B149.80601@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=yzt356@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.