From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 3/5] kvm : Fold pv_unhalt flag into GET_MP_STATE ioctl to aid migration Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:40:36 +0530 Message-ID: <52014A2C.5080705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20130806182150.2386.95104.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <20130806182309.2386.35697.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , Ingo Molnar , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , the arch/x86 maintainers , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Rik van Riel , srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com, KVM , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , chegu_vinod@hp.com, drjones@redhat.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu, Andi Kleen , avi.kivity@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner , lf-virt , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List To: Eric Northup Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 08/07/2013 12:02 AM, Eric Northup wrote: > > If this is about migration correctness, could it get folded into the > previous patch 2/5, so that there's not a broken commit which could > hurt bisection? Yes. It could be. Only reason I maintained like that was, original author in the previous patch is different (Srivatsa) and I did not want to merge this hunk when the patch series got evolved to mix the sign-offs. Gleb, Paolo please let me know.