From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: ceph-deploy progress and CDS session Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 13:34:22 +1200 Message-ID: <5201A41E.3000601@catalyst.net.nz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org Sender: ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org To: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org One thing that comes to mind is the ability to create (or activate) osd's with a custom crush specification from (say) a supplied file. Regards Mark On 03/08/13 06:02, Sage Weil wrote: > There is a session at CDS scheduled to discuss ceph-deploy (4:40pm PDT on > Monday). We'll be going over what we currently have in backlog for > improvements, but if you have any opinions about what else ceph-deploy > should or should not do or areas where it is problematic, please reply to > this thread to let us know what you think, and/or join the CDS discussion > hangout. > > For those who haven't noticed, we now have a full-time devoloper, > Alfredo Deza, who is working on ceph-deploy. He's been making huge > progress over the last couple of weeks improving error reporting, > visibility into what ceph-deploy is doing, and fixing various bugs. We > have a long list of things we want to do with the tool, but any feedback > from users is helpful to make sure we're working on the right things > first! >