From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com (top.free-electrons.com [176.31.233.9]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E6CE006E5 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix, from userid 106) id 964436E7B; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:46:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.free-electrons.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.56] (128-79-216-144.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr [128.79.216.144]) by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AF856E79; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:46:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <52025DD9.7030206@free-electrons.com> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 16:46:49 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni Organization: Free Electrons User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1375872027-20428-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Maxime Ripard , jimwall@q.com, brian@crystalfontz.com Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/2] barebox: Rework do_configure_prepend to do_pre_configure X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:46:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, On 07/08/2013 15:35, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Alexandre, > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: >> Defining a new task instead of using configure_prepend allows inheriting >> recipes to override the pre_configure task. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > I applied both batches to master branch. Thanks for those. > > I'd like to know if you'd be willing to prepare a patchset to move > barebox to OE-Core as it should be put there, not in meta-fsl-arm? > The actual current goal is to get support for the i.mx28 based cfa-100xx boards in meta-fsl-arm-extra. As the boards are supported by the mainline barebox and they have a defconfig there, I had to get the flexibility to do: do_pre_configure() { oe_runmake cfa10036_defconfig } in my recipe. Also, barebox_default_env is now generated in common/ and I want to had support for custom default environment. What features do you think would be missing before submitting that to oe-core ? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com