From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Woerner Subject: libnfnetlink license Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 17:36:42 +0200 Message-ID: <5202698A.6070109@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40179 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756804Ab3HGPgn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2013 11:36:43 -0400 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r77FaheC021905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 11:36:43 -0400 Received: from brasilia.fritz.box (brasilia.str.redhat.com [10.33.200.35]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r77FafQr002798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 11:36:42 -0400 Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, according to the libnfnetlink README the license is GPLv2+, but the information in src/iftable.c and src/rtnl.c is "GNU GPLv2" without the "+". Is this intentional? src/iftable.c: * This software is Free Software and licensed under GNU GPLv2. src/rtnl.c: * This software is free software and licensed under GNU GPLv2. README:This library is released under GPLv2+. Regards, Thomas