From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 07:51:13 -0700 Message-ID: <520501E1.3070301@zytor.com> References: <20130806114020.20643.57235.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <52016412.1020608@zytor.com> <5201B6FB.5080807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5201D180.9080005@zytor.com> <5201ED01.7000803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130808005012.GI2810@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20130808010251.GJ15901@redhat.com> <52040A05.5080107@zytor.com> <520423E9.80507@zytor.com> <5204E57A.3000002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130809130015.GA3730@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130809130015.GA3730@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: jeremy@goop.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, drjones@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, andi@firstfloor.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Raghavendra K T , mingo@redhat.com, habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu, avi.kivity@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, chegu_vinod@hp.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com, attilio.rao@citrix.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 08/09/2013 06:00 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:20:02PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> On 08/09/2013 04:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>> Okay, I figured it out. >>> >>> One of several problems with the formatting of this patchset is that it >>> has one- and two-digit patch numbers in the headers, which meant that my >>> scripts tried to apply patch 10 first. >>> >> >> My bad. I 'll send out in uniform digit form next time. >> > > If you use 'git format-patch --subject-prefix "PATCH V14" v3.11-rc4..' > and 'git send-email --subject "[PATCH V14] bla blah" ..' > that should be automatically taken care of? > Indeed it should. Another problem with this patchset was that the subject was duplicated in the body, which meant the tools didn't pick up the From: line. I ended up having to manually edit them. That seems to have been fixed, too, in V13. -hpa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934142Ab3HIOwv (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:52:51 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:48630 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934028Ab3HIOwt (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:52:49 -0400 Message-ID: <520501E1.3070301@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 07:51:13 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Raghavendra K T , Gleb Natapov , mingo@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, x86@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, peterz@infradead.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andi@firstfloor.org, attilio.rao@citrix.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu, gregkh@suse.de, agraf@suse.de, chegu_vinod@hp.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, avi.kivity@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks References: <20130806114020.20643.57235.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <52016412.1020608@zytor.com> <5201B6FB.5080807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5201D180.9080005@zytor.com> <5201ED01.7000803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130808005012.GI2810@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20130808010251.GJ15901@redhat.com> <52040A05.5080107@zytor.com> <520423E9.80507@zytor.com> <5204E57A.3000002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130809130015.GA3730@phenom.dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20130809130015.GA3730@phenom.dumpdata.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/09/2013 06:00 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:20:02PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> On 08/09/2013 04:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>> Okay, I figured it out. >>> >>> One of several problems with the formatting of this patchset is that it >>> has one- and two-digit patch numbers in the headers, which meant that my >>> scripts tried to apply patch 10 first. >>> >> >> My bad. I 'll send out in uniform digit form next time. >> > > If you use 'git format-patch --subject-prefix "PATCH V14" v3.11-rc4..' > and 'git send-email --subject "[PATCH V14] bla blah" ..' > that should be automatically taken care of? > Indeed it should. Another problem with this patchset was that the subject was duplicated in the body, which meant the tools didn't pick up the From: line. I ended up having to manually edit them. That seems to have been fixed, too, in V13. -hpa