From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Fernandes Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] dma: edma: Add one more required slot to MAX slots Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:19:18 -0500 Message-ID: <52092726.7030505@ti.com> References: <1375719297-12871-1-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> <1375719297-12871-9-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> <52087921.8040101@ti.com> <20130812133111.GZ6427@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130812133111.GZ6427-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: Errors-To: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Tony Lindgren , Grant Likely , Sricharan R , Russell King , Vinod Koul , Lokesh Vutla , Chris Ball , Arnd Bergmann , Rajendra Nayak , Rob Herring , Jason Kridner , Linux OMAP List , Linux ARM Kernel List , Linux DaVinci Kernel List , Balaji TK , Linux MMC List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Santosh Shilimkar , Dan List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 08/12/2013 08:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > >> No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where >> you include the two linked sets. > > Can you guys please think about the CC lists you're using for these > patch serieses? I've certainly no interest in random patches to the > DaVinci DMA controllers, and I suspect the same is true for most of the > people on the CC list. > Sorry. I was actually getting a sense of this. What I did initially was I copied the CC list from last years work on the same series hoping that it would be a complete mail chain. Bad judgement on my part. I should have paid more attention to Mark's rants about his inbox getting spammed with this series in those old threads ;) I guess moving forward I will use get_maintainer.pl and refine my git-send scripts with only interested folks. Any words of advice on when to and when not to CC someone remotely connected to a series is welcome. @Sekhar, let's keep only linux-omap, linux-davinci and few other interested folks on the CC chain for the rest of review on the series. Thanks, -Joel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joelf@ti.com (Joel Fernandes) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:19:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v3 08/12] dma: edma: Add one more required slot to MAX slots In-Reply-To: <20130812133111.GZ6427@sirena.org.uk> References: <1375719297-12871-1-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> <1375719297-12871-9-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> <52087921.8040101@ti.com> <20130812133111.GZ6427@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <52092726.7030505@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/12/2013 08:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > >> No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where >> you include the two linked sets. > > Can you guys please think about the CC lists you're using for these > patch serieses? I've certainly no interest in random patches to the > DaVinci DMA controllers, and I suspect the same is true for most of the > people on the CC list. > Sorry. I was actually getting a sense of this. What I did initially was I copied the CC list from last years work on the same series hoping that it would be a complete mail chain. Bad judgement on my part. I should have paid more attention to Mark's rants about his inbox getting spammed with this series in those old threads ;) I guess moving forward I will use get_maintainer.pl and refine my git-send scripts with only interested folks. Any words of advice on when to and when not to CC someone remotely connected to a series is welcome. @Sekhar, let's keep only linux-omap, linux-davinci and few other interested folks on the CC chain for the rest of review on the series. Thanks, -Joel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754738Ab3HLTjf (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:39:35 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:58897 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752290Ab3HLTjc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:39:32 -0400 Message-ID: <52092726.7030505@ti.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:19:18 -0500 From: Joel Fernandes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Sekhar Nori , Tony Lindgren , Grant Likely , Sricharan R , Russell King , Vinod Koul , Lokesh Vutla , Chris Ball , Arnd Bergmann , Rajendra Nayak , Rob Herring , Jason Kridner , Linux OMAP List , Linux ARM Kernel List , Linux DaVinci Kernel List , Balaji TK , Linux MMC List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Gururaja Hebbar , Santosh Shilimkar , Dan Williams , Olof Johansson , Benoit Cousson , Matt Porter Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] dma: edma: Add one more required slot to MAX slots References: <1375719297-12871-1-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> <1375719297-12871-9-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> <52087921.8040101@ti.com> <20130812133111.GZ6427@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130812133111.GZ6427@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/12/2013 08:31 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > >> No need for a separate patch for this, just do this in the patch where >> you include the two linked sets. > > Can you guys please think about the CC lists you're using for these > patch serieses? I've certainly no interest in random patches to the > DaVinci DMA controllers, and I suspect the same is true for most of the > people on the CC list. > Sorry. I was actually getting a sense of this. What I did initially was I copied the CC list from last years work on the same series hoping that it would be a complete mail chain. Bad judgement on my part. I should have paid more attention to Mark's rants about his inbox getting spammed with this series in those old threads ;) I guess moving forward I will use get_maintainer.pl and refine my git-send scripts with only interested folks. Any words of advice on when to and when not to CC someone remotely connected to a series is welcome. @Sekhar, let's keep only linux-omap, linux-davinci and few other interested folks on the CC chain for the rest of review on the series. Thanks, -Joel