From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA26E01405 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V99pj-0005HY-S8 for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:20:03 +0200 Received: from 213.249.12.88 ([213.249.12.88]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:20:03 +0200 Received: from gmane by 213.249.12.88 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:20:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: Robert Berger Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:18:25 +0300 Message-ID: <5209EBD1.6040403@reliableembeddedsystems.com> References: <3217805.kYDiUIXKQu@helios> <20130812091145.GE12589@sestofb10.enea.se> <3375908.sLNS3qEgcB@helios> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.249.12.88 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 In-Reply-To: <3375908.sLNS3qEgcB@helios> Cc: public-yocto-EtnWKYl6rD/WsZ/bQMPhNw@plane.gmane.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Stenberg?= Subject: Re: [Announcement] Yocto Project 1.5 Milestone 3 now available. X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:20:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 08/12/2013 12:28 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > I agree. In fact our test lab would probably be limited to the reference > boards that the Yocto Project officially supports within meta-yocto i.e. what we > currently test on manually. I have the Yocto reference boards as well, but will add boards on customer request (some are already on the queue). BTW what should be defined what kind of extra hardware/software is needed for remote hardware testing. As I said I have some infrastructure to power on/off boards and monitor the serial over conserver(s). Is that's it? Regards, Robert ..."100% test coverage is insufficient. 35% of the faults are missing logic paths." - Robert Glass My public pgp key is available,at: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x90320BF1