From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Call for participants : teuthology weekly meeting Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:56:46 +0200 Message-ID: <520A2D0E.9060709@dachary.org> References: <52028301.70301@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig85AB7F5A1CCB137565F8411E" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([86.65.39.20]:55340 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757989Ab3HMM4t (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:56:49 -0400 Received: from [10.8.0.22] (unknown [10.8.0.22]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7358F26394 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:56:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <52028301.70301@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig85AB7F5A1CCB137565F8411E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ceph, Teuthology was successfully installed & run as described here: http://dachary.org/?p=3D2204 with only two minor glitches: "teuthology : ulimit: error" http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-syst= ems.ceph.devel/16421 "do not check the jobid if check-locks is False" https://github.com/ceph/= teuthology/pull/27 Cheers On 07/08/2013 19:25, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Ceph, >=20 > During the Emperor summit this week, running and installing teuthology = with a minimum effort was discussed ( see http://youtu.be/hrQuYzyXvVg?t=3D= 1h21m49s and http://pad.ceph.com/p/cds-teuthology ) I've installed it onc= e, back in January 2013 and that was not too difficult but required a few= hours and exchanging a few mails. More importantly, I soon discovered th= at the Inktank developers are modifying teuthology quite often and don't = really have the bandwidth to make sure any third party can install or upg= rade. It is still very much a tool internal to inktank. >=20 > There are a number of Ceph developers who, like me, would like to be ab= le to run teuthology on their own machines. But none of us has the time t= o make that happen on his / her own. However, if we get together, we may = be able to do it. The trick is to keep up with Inktank changes and we may= have found a way : meet online with the Inktank's teuthology developers = on a weekly basis to bridge the gap. That would not be forever : just unt= il there are enough teuthology users and Inktank is just one of them. >=20 > Of course that will require some work on our part ( non Inktank employe= es ) but the overall benefit of running integration tests is worth it. At= least it's enough incentive for me to dedicate at least 4 hours on a wee= kly basis.=20 >=20 > This is an open discussion, nothing is set except the commitment of Ink= tank to participate in these meetings and my own commitment of at least 4= hours / week i.e. half a day doing just this. Including the meeting ;-)= >=20 > Who's willing to join this effort ? Do you think there is a better way = ? >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do noth= ing. --------------enig85AB7F5A1CCB137565F8411E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIKLQ4ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23engCfQYyomkbk8vmUDDkW/Hfk0bUk a9cAn0QDKRnzyzpkn9Q4mIFN5ijJxnNI =aRsS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig85AB7F5A1CCB137565F8411E--