From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Using aio_poll for timer carrier threads
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:32:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520B78C9.1010306@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A3EEF.5050509@siemens.com>
On 2013-08-13 16:13, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-08-13 15:45, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> This should make timers usable in another thread for clock device
>> emulation if only your iothread uses the AioContext and its timers
>> (besides the thread-safe mod/del interfaces).
>
> As argued in the other thread, I don't think we need (and want) locking
> in the timer subsystem, rather push this to its users. But I'll look
> again at your patches, if they are also usable.
I've checked and applied your two patches adding the active_timers lock.
This model apparently works as well for the RTC use case. And it avoids
having to patch aio_poll, the RTC device lock is now taken inside the
timer handlers.
I still need to check more corner cases as timer dequeuing can now race
with the handler execution, ie. a dequeued timer can still see one more
handler run after timer_del returned. That's a property one can easily
take into account when writing device models, but it has to be kept in
mind that it's different from current behavior.
Updated queue is at git://git.kiszka.org/qemu.git queues/rt.new3 again.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 7:56 [Qemu-devel] Using aio_poll for timer carrier threads Jan Kiszka
2013-08-13 13:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-13 14:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-14 0:48 ` liu ping fan
2013-08-14 8:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-14 9:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-14 11:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-14 12:32 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-08-19 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-13 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-13 14:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-19 13:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-19 13:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-08-19 14:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-19 13:58 ` Alex Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520B78C9.1010306@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.