All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <520B8468.7050307@arm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 5dddbcf..443a780 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On 14/08/13 12:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
 >> for
 >> which we can have PPC specific wrapper above the generic one i.e. get
 >> the cpu node and then parse for thread id under custom property.
-> 
+>=20
 > A wrapper is wrong. I don't want to have to have all ppc callers to use
 > a different function.
 Ok.
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ registering the CPU device. It can be retrieved from cpu_dev->of_node.
 So direct users of of_get_cpu_node can be reduced to avoid unnecessary
 parsing of DT to find cpu node.
 
-> 
+>=20
 > As I said, just make a generic one that returns a thread ID, ie, same
 > signature as the powerpc one. Make it weak, we can override it in
 > powerpc-land,
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ as weak is not so clean.
 > into the generic one, it won't hurt, but leave the thread_id return
 > there, it doesn't hurt it will come in handy in a few cases without
 > causing code duplication.
-> 
+>=20
 
 IMO moving of handling ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s to generic code under
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC seems to be cleaner approach than weak definitation.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index a715ee1..f4bf442 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -9,16 +9,16 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:21:44 +0100\0"
  "To\0Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>"
-  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
-  Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-  rob.herring@calxeda.com <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
-  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-  Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
+ "Cc\0devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>"
   linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+  Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
+  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
- " devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>\0"
+  rob.herring@calxeda.com <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
+  Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
+  Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
+  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
+ " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 14/08/13 12:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:\n"
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
  ">> for\n"
  ">> which we can have PPC specific wrapper above the generic one i.e. get\n"
  ">> the cpu node and then parse for thread id under custom property.\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> A wrapper is wrong. I don't want to have to have all ppc callers to use\n"
  "> a different function.\n"
  "Ok.\n"
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
  "So direct users of of_get_cpu_node can be reduced to avoid unnecessary\n"
  "parsing of DT to find cpu node.\n"
  "\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> As I said, just make a generic one that returns a thread ID, ie, same\n"
  "> signature as the powerpc one. Make it weak, we can override it in\n"
  "> powerpc-land,\n"
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
  "> into the generic one, it won't hurt, but leave the thread_id return\n"
  "> there, it doesn't hurt it will come in handy in a few cases without\n"
  "> causing code duplication.\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "\n"
  "IMO moving of handling ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s to generic code under\n"
  "#ifdef CONFIG_PPC seems to be cleaner approach than weak definitation.\n"
@@ -69,4 +69,4 @@
  "\n"
  [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/219
 
-1d2b32d7bfd26e5507de2e9acdae1f5c8f1aa394b6a7a203e31d205a17350f31
+6250d36cee1f20763c0d9b42b608b6d5d25bc4ae6dc85eaaac42d9e7114f5f39

diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index a715ee1..7f03945 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -5,20 +5,10 @@
  "ref\01376428024.4255.14.camel@pasglop\0"
  "ref\0520B5584.7030608@arm.com\0"
  "ref\01376480227.4255.66.camel@pasglop\0"
- "From\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12\0"
+ "From\0Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (Sudeep KarkadaNagesha)\0"
+ "Subject\0[GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:21:44 +0100\0"
- "To\0Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>"
-  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
-  Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-  rob.herring@calxeda.com <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
-  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-  Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
-  linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
- " devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 14/08/13 12:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:\n"
@@ -69,4 +59,4 @@
  "\n"
  [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/219
 
-1d2b32d7bfd26e5507de2e9acdae1f5c8f1aa394b6a7a203e31d205a17350f31
+f77600da288b16b5d647a1bad6810cc82a6d340bbc07967699607d0d393adc0e

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.