From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Atom2 <ariel.atom2@web2web.at>
Subject: Re: Powerdown problem on XEN | ACPI S5
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:16:10 +0200
Message-ID: <520C8E4A.9090504@web2web.at>
References: <520B4465.6000600@web2web.at>
	<520B784F02000078000EBD42@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<520B8B8E.5020504@web2web.at> <520B8D63.6040903@citrix.com>
	<520BB7B7.1000108@web2web.at> <520BBEC3.6060004@citrix.com>
	<520BCF0B.4010106@web2web.at> <520BD621.1040701@web2web.at>
	<520BD80B.4060101@citrix.com> <520BDCE4.3040803@web2web.at>
	<520BE5FA.8040306@citrix.com> <520BE76A.9010905@web2web.at>
	<520BEAC9.107@citrix.com> <520BEE8D.3060704@web2web.at>
	<520CA99C02000078000EC184@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <ariel.atom2@web2web.at>) id 1V9sjG-0001bp-Sc
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:16:23 +0000
In-Reply-To: <520CA99C02000078000EC184@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jan,
many thanks for that clarification.

Am 15.08.13 10:12, schrieb Jan Beulich:
>>>> On 14.08.13 at 22:54, Atom2 <ariel.atom2@web2web.at> wrote:
>> Ian (Campbell) originally diverted me to Jan (Beulich) who seemed to
>> have an idea before you thankfully jumped in. Jan's idea seemed to also
>> revolve around ACPI - although not tables, but registers:
>>
>> quote from Jan Beulich:
>>   > It would be particularly interesting to know whether perhaps
>>   > some of the ACPI registers live in memory space on that
>>   > system - I already have a patch queued up (but not submitted
>>   > yet) that fixes problems in that case.
>>
>> @Jan: would it make sense to go down that route?
>
> No, that's clearly not an issue here, given the more complete
> logs you sent meanwhile.
>
> Jan
>