From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@huawei.com>
Cc: "Wanglin \(Albert\)" <albert.wanglin@huawei.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add command line partition parser
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 01:32:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520C9235.5070104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3050A4DBA34F345975765E43127F10F1C064375@szxeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
On 08/15/2013 12:45 AM, Caizhiyong wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brian Norris [mailto:computersforpeace@gmail.com]
...
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 06:16:04AM +0000, Caizhiyong wrote:
>>> I want to use the MTD command line partition method on block devices (eMMC).
>>> It is very suitable for embedded systems. I think, in embedded system partition
>> method,
>>> if somebody need some feature on MTD device, he may be also need it on block device.
>>> so I fully functional reference MTD command line partition.
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> I'm curious: have you seen any need for a similar arrangement via
>> device-tree? See, for example, drivers/mtd/ofpart.c.
>
> So far, I have no seen. We mainly use ARM. For ARM, device-tree is a new thing.
But device-tree is *the* thing for ARM going forward, and the kernel
command line can get unwieldy (and beyond its limits) pretty quickly
like this.
>>> I hope extend the flexibility to block device.
>>
>> Sure. I'll try to review the full patch soon and test out integrating
>> it with MTD.
>
> If there is no problem, I will send my next patch, mtd cmdline parts use cmdline-parser lib.
We will get some reviews on this soon (no time for me tonight). Do you
already have a mtd patch? If so, you might as well post it for review as
well.
Thanks,
Brian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wanglin (Albert)" <albert.wanglin@huawei.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>,
Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add command line partition parser
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 01:32:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520C9235.5070104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3050A4DBA34F345975765E43127F10F1C064375@szxeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
On 08/15/2013 12:45 AM, Caizhiyong wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brian Norris [mailto:computersforpeace@gmail.com]
...
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 06:16:04AM +0000, Caizhiyong wrote:
>>> I want to use the MTD command line partition method on block devices (eMMC).
>>> It is very suitable for embedded systems. I think, in embedded system partition
>> method,
>>> if somebody need some feature on MTD device, he may be also need it on block device.
>>> so I fully functional reference MTD command line partition.
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> I'm curious: have you seen any need for a similar arrangement via
>> device-tree? See, for example, drivers/mtd/ofpart.c.
>
> So far, I have no seen. We mainly use ARM. For ARM, device-tree is a new thing.
But device-tree is *the* thing for ARM going forward, and the kernel
command line can get unwieldy (and beyond its limits) pretty quickly
like this.
>>> I hope extend the flexibility to block device.
>>
>> Sure. I'll try to review the full patch soon and test out integrating
>> it with MTD.
>
> If there is no problem, I will send my next patch, mtd cmdline parts use cmdline-parser lib.
We will get some reviews on this soon (no time for me tonight). Do you
already have a mtd patch? If so, you might as well post it for review as
well.
Thanks,
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-03 9:57 [PATCH] block: support embedded device command line partition Caizhiyong
2013-08-05 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-06 10:53 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-07 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-13 6:02 ` [PATCH] block: add command line partition parser Caizhiyong
2013-08-14 22:57 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-14 22:57 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-15 0:11 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-15 0:11 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-15 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-15 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-15 3:38 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-15 3:38 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-15 5:00 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-15 5:00 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-15 6:16 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-15 6:16 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-15 7:09 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-15 7:09 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-15 7:45 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-15 7:45 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-15 8:32 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2013-08-15 8:32 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-15 15:52 ` [PATCH] block: support embedded device command line partition Stephen Warren
2013-08-16 2:54 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-16 16:02 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-19 8:36 ` Caizhiyong
2013-08-19 16:05 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-17 11:15 ` Linus Walleij
2013-09-17 13:08 ` Caizhiyong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520C9235.5070104@gmail.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=albert.wanglin@huawei.com \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=caizhiyong@huawei.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.