From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from owm.eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224B2E01575 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 05:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <520CC6B7.1090809@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:16:55 +0100 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130806 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laszlo Papp References: <520C9E77.1060201@communistcode.co.uk> <520CC328.4020106@communistcode.co.uk> <520CC46F.9020501@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Stunnel recipe X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:16:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 15/08/13 13:12, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Jack Mitchell > wrote: > > I've no idea what stunnel does, I imagine you're more qualified to > decide on it's sub category. > > > I am not really that qualified with subcategory management in Yocto, so > I hope someone can confirm this... > > openembedded-devel will be a better list to contact according to the > MAINTAINERS > file: http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-networking/MAINTAINERS Yes, I would send the patch to the openembedded-devel list, with what you think is a suitable sub-category. Copy in Joe MacDonald (joe@deserted.net) as he's the maintainer and will be best suited to helping decide where it should go. Apologies for the misunderstanding. -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer Cambrideshire, UK http://www.embed.me.uk --