diff for duplicates of <520E1EC8.1010001@arm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e12e3f4..21add9f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ On 16/08/13 13:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:48 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: -> +>=20 >>> Naming is a bit gross. You might want to make it clearer that >>> we are talking about CPU IDs in the device-tree here. >>> @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ On 16/08/13 13:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> Also unlike PPC, in ARM we don't set hard processor id value based >> values read from device tree. DT must contain the values matching to the >> hardware ID registers. -> +>=20 > This is exactly the same on ppc. We don't "set" HW values. The > device-tree content matches the HW internals. Some processors have a > "PIR" register as well which contains the HW value, in this case the > device-tree must contain the same value as the PIR on that processor. -> +>=20 Ok, I misread the function 'set_hard_smp_processor_id' function. BTW, you didn't mention if you are OK by just have this clearly documented in the function and/or you have any preference/better name. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 38457ef..3d9f212 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -8,24 +8,24 @@ "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures\0" "Date\0Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:44:56 +0100\0" "To\0Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>\0" - "Cc\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>" - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org> + "Cc\0Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>" devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> + Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> + linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org> + Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au <microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au> linux@openrisc.net <linux@openrisc.net> - linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> - Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> - Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + rob.herring@calxeda.com <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> grant.likely@linaro.org <grant.likely@linaro.org> - " rob.herring@calxeda.com <rob.herring@calxeda.com>\0" + linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 16/08/13 13:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:\n" "> On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:48 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:\n" - "> \n" + ">=20\n" ">>> Naming is a bit gross. You might want to make it clearer that\n" ">>> we are talking about CPU IDs in the device-tree here.\n" ">>>\n" @@ -33,12 +33,12 @@ ">> Also unlike PPC, in ARM we don't set hard processor id value based\n" ">> values read from device tree. DT must contain the values matching to the\n" ">> hardware ID registers.\n" - "> \n" + ">=20\n" "> This is exactly the same on ppc. We don't \"set\" HW values. The\n" "> device-tree content matches the HW internals. Some processors have a\n" "> \"PIR\" register as well which contains the HW value, in this case the\n" "> device-tree must contain the same value as the PIR on that processor.\n" - "> \n" + ">=20\n" "Ok, I misread the function 'set_hard_smp_processor_id' function.\n" "BTW, you didn't mention if you are OK by just have this clearly\n" "documented in the function and/or you have any preference/better name.\n" @@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ "Regards,\n" Sudeep -5376b426afe0ab1b3f5272269668fb1ed366ba13cefffe7c0154efcb3424a45b +4331e3a8a97c6f78a3ebe9e0d70b77c30ce9fdb8acc300c76c7fcdc292334646
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 38457ef..e33f5fa 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -4,23 +4,10 @@ "ref\01376628563.4255.137.camel@pasglop\0" "ref\0520DE753.8090601@arm.com\0" "ref\01376656351.25016.2.camel@pasglop\0" - "From\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures\0" + "From\0Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (Sudeep KarkadaNagesha)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures\0" "Date\0Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:44:56 +0100\0" - "To\0Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>\0" - "Cc\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>" - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - linux-pm@vger.kernel.org <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org> - devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> - microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au <microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au> - linux@openrisc.net <linux@openrisc.net> - linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> - Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> - Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> - Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> - grant.likely@linaro.org <grant.likely@linaro.org> - " rob.herring@calxeda.com <rob.herring@calxeda.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 16/08/13 13:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:\n" @@ -49,4 +36,4 @@ "Regards,\n" Sudeep -5376b426afe0ab1b3f5272269668fb1ed366ba13cefffe7c0154efcb3424a45b +6e9d2ccab7911e696354f2900512d86d7fb376d7db6e5413fbdc138aea9f7867
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.