From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: "Yang Zhang" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] mc146818rtc: correct UIP hold length
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:43:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5210DDA2.1060703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376489436-29136-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Il 14/08/2013 16:10, James Hogan ha scritto:
> The UIP (update in progress) hold time was set to 8 32.768KHz clock
> cycles (around 244uS). However the timing diagram in the datasheet
> (Figure 16) shows that the UIP bit is held for both the update cycle
> time (either 248uS or 1984uS depending on the clock source), and the
> minimum time before update cycle (244uS).
>
> It's clear from periodic_timer_update() that only a 32.768KHz clock
> source is expected, so correct the hold time to 244uS + 1984uS = 73
> 32.768KHz clock cycles.
I am not sure if this time would actually go from t-244us to t+1984us on
real hardware? You could measure this using a divider reset and
sampling PF and UF.
The emulation right now does "instant" updates, which elegantly
sidesteps the problem. :)
> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
> Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> index 3c3baac..6000feb 100644
> --- a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> +++ b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
>
> #define RTC_REINJECT_ON_ACK_COUNT 20
> #define RTC_CLOCK_RATE 32768
> -#define UIP_HOLD_LENGTH (8 * NSEC_PER_SEC / 32768)
> +#define UIP_HOLD_LENGTH (73 * NSEC_PER_SEC / 32768)
>
> #define MC146818_RTC(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(RTCState, (obj), TYPE_MC146818_RTC)
>
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static int update_in_progress(RTCState *s)
> }
>
> guest_nsec = get_guest_rtc_ns(s);
> - /* UIP bit will be set at last 244us of every second. */
> + /* UIP bit will be set at last 1984us + 244us of every second. */
> if ((guest_nsec % NSEC_PER_SEC) >= (NSEC_PER_SEC - UIP_HOLD_LENGTH)) {
> return 1;
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-18 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-14 14:10 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] mc146818rtc: correct UIP hold length James Hogan
2013-08-18 14:43 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5210DDA2.1060703@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.