All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <52128995.1080200@elopez.com.ar>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index fbfdd6e..e8e3ee6 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Hi Maxime,
 
-El 17/08/13 16:08, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
+El 17/08/13 16:08, Maxime Ripard escribió:
 > The Allwinner A20 is almost identical to the earlier A10 SoC from
 > Allwinner on many aspects, including the clocks tree. However, since the
 > A20 has some additionnal IPs compared to the A10, the clock tree isn't
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ El 17/08/13 16:08, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
 
 Code wise it looks good to me, I just have some small comments.
 
-Reviewed-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
+Reviewed-by: Emilio López <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
 
 > ---
 >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt  |  3 +
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 505abe1..b4dfce8 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,14 +1,21 @@
  "ref\01376766523-9107-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com\0"
  "ref\01376766523-9107-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com\0"
- "From\0emilio@elopez.com.ar (Emilio L\303\263pez)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: Add Allwinner A20 gates\0"
+ "From\0Emilio L\303\263pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: Add Allwinner A20 gates\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:09:41 -0300\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>"
+  kevin.z.m.zh <kevin.z.m.zh@gmail.com>
+ " \345\255\231\345\275\246\351\202\246 <sunny@allwinnertech.com>"
+ " \345\220\264\344\271\246\350\200\225 <shuge@allwinnertech.com>"
+  Mailing List
+  Arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+ " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi Maxime,\n"
  "\n"
- "El 17/08/13 16:08, Maxime Ripard escribi?:\n"
+ "El 17/08/13 16:08, Maxime Ripard escribi\303\263:\n"
  "> The Allwinner A20 is almost identical to the earlier A10 SoC from\n"
  "> Allwinner on many aspects, including the clocks tree. However, since the\n"
  "> A20 has some additionnal IPs compared to the A10, the clock tree isn't\n"
@@ -19,7 +26,7 @@
  "\n"
  "Code wise it looks good to me, I just have some small comments.\n"
  "\n"
- "Reviewed-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>\n"
+ "Reviewed-by: Emilio L\303\263pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>\n"
  "\n"
  "> ---\n"
  ">   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt  |  3 +\n"
@@ -230,4 +237,4 @@
  "\n"
  Emilio
 
-4c4730c6aebec799529ef4456e42c74f9f033b9460caaae656cf77d2876fa564
+3083a2046c7639bc8ba60da2e4467a1ea9e2883a988c731d36bdeca51a86f798

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.