From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VBmKP-0008HK-RF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:50:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VBmKG-0006DP-Bf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:50:33 -0400 Received: from mail6.webfaction.com ([74.55.86.74]:57035 helo=smtp.webfaction.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VBmKG-0006DA-4m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:50:24 -0400 Message-ID: <5213741E.3040702@ctshepherd.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:50:22 +0100 From: Charlie Shepherd MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1377006143-15753-1-git-send-email-charlie@ctshepherd.com> <521372F7.2090508@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <521372F7.2090508@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Make cow_co_is_allocated and cow_update_bitmap more efficient List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, gabriel@kerneis.info, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 20/08/2013 14:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I had very similar patches in my series to add get_block_status... Ah, sorry if I've duplicated something you've already done. Stefan encouraged me to contribute to an area of QEMU I found interesting and seeing the XXX I thought I'd take a shot at improving the code. Where should I look in the future for patches like this? Charlie