From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Jerasure & Ceph Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:32:42 +0200 Message-ID: <5214893A.2020005@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAE3AE9F752D1E6F74DD4F52B" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([86.65.39.20]:54565 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751360Ab3HUJcs (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 05:32:48 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "James S. Plank" Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAE3AE9F752D1E6F74DD4F52B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi James, I'm working on adding jerasure as a plugin to Ceph. If I remember correct= ly the next version of jerasure was scheduled to be released this month. = Although using jerasure-1.2 ( as found at http://web.eecs.utk.edu/~plank/= plank/papers/CS-08-627.html ) would be perfectly fine, it may be worth wa= iting for a few days if a release is imminent. Do you advise to wait for the next version of jerasure ? Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do noth= ing. --------------enigAE3AE9F752D1E6F74DD4F52B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIUiToACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23cAACfVvVJ2Itio73k/G9kSVv/fz1V RqQAn312xTzfdlaS/VXNccKS/jmSTw9D =xKXR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAE3AE9F752D1E6F74DD4F52B--