From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBse-00017U-Sr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:07:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBsX-0004q0-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:07:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51868 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBsX-0004pk-CX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:07:29 -0400 Message-ID: <5214F3CC.1050509@suse.de> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:07:24 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1377103396-24307-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1377103396-24307-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20130821170358.GB12305@redhat.com> <5214F2B5.2080507@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5214F2B5.2080507@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] pc: get rid of builtin pvpanic List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rhod@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com Am 21.08.2013 19:02, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 21/08/2013 19:03, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>> It is a source of pain, and the previous patch anyway changed the >>>> behavior of "-M pc-1.5" compared to the real 1.5. >>>> >>>> This also makes it clear that "-device pvpanic" is not enough: >>>> it will not expose pvpanic in fw_cfg properly. >>>> >>>> No idea how to fix that. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >> That should be the first step. Make the device work properly. >> We'll discuss compatibility when that is clear. >> >=20 > Actually these patches are not based on origin/master (my mistake)... I > haven't tested, rebasing should be enough if "-device pvpanic" was > tested properly for 1.6. I haven't tested myself but I remember seeing patches moving fw_cfg integration into the initfn/realizefn. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg