All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, swarren@nvidia.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Tegra: remove target_cpu_speed[] array
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:27:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52153EC3.1030204@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <896370a3ad0db9e85f8776d923fcd5129d4e4d56.1377080903.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 08/21/2013 04:31 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Tegra's cpufreq driver was maintaining requested target frequencies in an array:
> target_cpu_speed. And then finally setting the highest requested freq in the
> core. This was probably done because both cores share clock line and logically
> we want to set both cores to the max frequency requested..
> 
> But this wasn't required to be done in individual CPUFreq drivers, its already
> taken care of by CPUFreq governors. They evaluate load for all CPUs and finally
> call target only for the frequency corresponding to max load.
> 
> So, get rid of this stuff from Tegra's cpufreq driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Its only build tested and depends on lots of stuff that I have already sent for
> cpufreq core and its drivers. All of that is pushed here:
> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-v3.13
> 
> And only Tegra+cpufreq-core patches are pushed here (only 13 patches):
> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cpufreq-next-tegra
> 
> You can probably try cpufreq-next-tegra branch for testing on some real
> hardware.

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

I did test your branch on a Tegra20 and Tegra30 board without issues.
But recall that our cpufreq driver doesn't actually get initialized
since the conversion of Tegra to the common clock framework, so I
haven't really tested the cpufreq changes, except to ensure that nothing
in those branches breaks other basic functionality.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-21 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-21 10:31 [PATCH] cpufreq: Tegra: remove target_cpu_speed[] array Viresh Kumar
2013-08-21 22:27 ` Stephen Warren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52153EC3.1030204@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.