From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Duan Jiong Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ipv6: handle Redirect ICMP Message with no Redirected Header option Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:28:11 +0800 Message-ID: <5215692B.5090206@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <521468C4.5020700@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130821111700.GE20223@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: hannes@stressinduktion.org Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:10774 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752185Ab3HVB2x convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:28:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130821111700.GE20223@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =E4=BA=8E 2013=E5=B9=B408=E6=9C=8821=E6=97=A5 19:17, Hannes Frederic So= wa =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 03:14:12PM +0800, Duan Jiong wrote: >> From: Duan Jiong >> >> rfc 4861 says the Redirected Header option is optional, so >> the kernel should not drop the Redirect Message that has no >> Redirected Header option. In this patch, the function >> ip6_redirect_no_header() is introduced to deal with that >> condition. >> >> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong >=20 > Sorry for being so picky about local socket delivery before. You were= right > all along. >=20 > I just tested and reviewed this patch and everything is fine: >=20 > Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa >=20 > Just out of curiosity, can you tell because of which devices you did > this patch? In fact, i did this patch just because i want to learn more about the ipv6 implemention.