From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mugunthan V N Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:43:20 +0530 Message-ID: <5217B450.6060006@ti.com> References: <1377283987-20040-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1377283987-20040-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Mack Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, nsekhar@ti.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, davem@davemloft.net, ujhelyi.m@gmail.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, d-gerlach@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 24 August 2013 12:23 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > Note that for personal reasons, I won't be able to work on that patch > set for two weeks, starting from a few hours from now. If there are any > more objections or comments, I'll catch up after that period. Or if > anyone wants to make minor changes to my patches and resubmit them, > I'd also be fine with that :) > > The compatible discussion is still ongoing, but I'd rather submit what > I got until now, and I'm also still convinced that having > ti,am3352-cpsw is still the best we can do. Apart from the DT compatibility discussion this patch series looks good to me. Acked-by: Mugunthan V N Regards Mugunthan V N From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mugunthanvnm@ti.com (Mugunthan V N) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:43:20 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register In-Reply-To: <1377283987-20040-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> References: <1377283987-20040-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5217B450.6060006@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Saturday 24 August 2013 12:23 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > Note that for personal reasons, I won't be able to work on that patch > set for two weeks, starting from a few hours from now. If there are any > more objections or comments, I'll catch up after that period. Or if > anyone wants to make minor changes to my patches and resubmit them, > I'd also be fine with that :) > > The compatible discussion is still ongoing, but I'd rather submit what > I got until now, and I'm also still convinced that having > ti,am3352-cpsw is still the best we can do. Apart from the DT compatibility discussion this patch series looks good to me. Acked-by: Mugunthan V N Regards Mugunthan V N From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mugunthan V N Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:43:20 +0530 Message-ID: <5217B450.6060006@ti.com> References: <1377283987-20040-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , To: Daniel Mack Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:39178 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752960Ab3HWTN5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:13:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1377283987-20040-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 24 August 2013 12:23 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > Note that for personal reasons, I won't be able to work on that patch > set for two weeks, starting from a few hours from now. If there are any > more objections or comments, I'll catch up after that period. Or if > anyone wants to make minor changes to my patches and resubmit them, > I'd also be fine with that :) > > The compatible discussion is still ongoing, but I'd rather submit what > I got until now, and I'm also still convinced that having > ti,am3352-cpsw is still the best we can do. Apart from the DT compatibility discussion this patch series looks good to me. Acked-by: Mugunthan V N Regards Mugunthan V N