From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Lars Poeschel <larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de>,
Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>, Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Jon Hunter <jgchunter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:49:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5217BCE1.4080101@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYAjKhKC+Aaa4iQBXsJ46mgOta_SVztVyB=HZCGJD-b2g@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/23/2013 12:38 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 08/21/2013 05:27 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday 21 of August 2013 15:38:54 Lars Poeschel wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> To solve this dilemma, perform an interrupt consistency check
>>>>>> when adding a GPIO chip: if the chip is both gpio-controller and
>>>>>> interrupt-controller, walk all children of the device tree,
>>>>
>>>> It seems a little odd to solve this only for DT. What about the non-DT case?
>>>
>>> DT is the hardware configuration system that lets you request
>>> the same resource in two ways, i.e. it allows one and the same
>>> node to be both gpio-controller and interrupt-controller, and
>>> start handing out the same line as both GPIO and IRQ
>>> independently.
>>
>> Huh? What stops systems using board files and platform data from having
>> this issue?
>
> It can't be stopped but I consider it a bug if they do, as the proper
> way to handle such GPIO lines is the sequence:
>
> request_gpio(gpio);
> request_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio));
Back in the old days of ARM board files, there were many boards that
didn't do this. I guess that doesn't make it any less of a bug, but it
certainly implies to me that solving this in a way that caters to that
bug being present will be a lot more useful.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-23 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 13:38 [PATCH v2] gpio: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs Lars Poeschel
2013-08-21 21:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-21 23:10 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-21 23:27 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-22 20:53 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-23 9:51 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-23 18:38 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-23 19:49 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-08-29 18:51 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-21 23:36 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-22 21:10 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-23 9:40 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-23 19:48 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-26 10:30 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-23 18:45 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-23 19:52 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-23 19:55 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-23 20:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-26 10:45 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-27 20:05 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-29 19:00 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-30 20:08 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-02 9:43 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-09-03 12:28 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-22 9:01 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-22 21:08 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-22 22:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-22 13:16 ` Andreas Larsson
2013-08-26 10:56 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-26 11:29 ` Andreas Larsson
2013-08-26 14:04 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-08-27 6:06 ` Andreas Larsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5217BCE1.4080101@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eballetbo@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=jgchunter@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=poeschel@lemonage.de \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.