From: Bruce Link <Bruce@1045.ca>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
1063474@bugs.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: System fails to connect to iHOS-104 DVD drive with nvidia MCP61 chipset.
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 19:34:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5217FFB2.4050007@1045.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADLC3L27QcScLgw4CBGkQ3tG5037CAgQJRdW5384=sL8cM8a3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/18/2013 2:05 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Link <Bruce@1045.ca> wrote:
>> On 8/15/2013 9:47 PM, Bruce Link wrote:
>>> On 8/15/2013 12:36 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Bruce Link <Bruce@1045.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> These NVIDIA SATA controllers are a pain as they all seem to have a
>>>>>> different set of bugs related to hardreset, etc. What happens if you
>>>>>> boot up
>>>>>> without the drive connected and then plug in the cable after the system
>>>>>> boots up?
>>>>> Roughly the same error is returned. See below for the dmesg output.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> root@teevee:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:06.0/ata1/host0/scsi_host/host0#
>>>>> echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_host/host4/scan
>>>>>
>>>>> root@teevee:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:06.0/ata1/host0/scsi_host/host0#
>>>>> dmesg|grep ata5
>>>>> [ 1.030224] ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x9e0 ctl 0xbe0 bmdma 0xc400
>>>>> irq
>>>>> 20
>>>>> [ 1.354216] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>>>> [ 944.773288] ata5: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x50000 action
>>>>> 0xf
>>>>> [ 944.773304] ata5: SError: { PHYRdyChg CommWake }
>>>>> [ 944.773322] ata5: hard resetting link
>>>>> [ 945.652070] ata5: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>>>>> [ 945.660176] ata5.00: ATAPI: ATAPI iHOS104, WL0F, max UDMA/100
>>>>> [ 945.676165] ata5.00: configured for UDMA/100
>>>>> [ 950.676049] ata5.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa0)
>>>>> [ 950.676056] ata5.00: TEST_UNIT_READY failed (err_mask=0x5)
>>>>> [ 950.676064] ata5: hard resetting link
>>>>> [ 950.676066] ata5: nv: skipping hardreset on occupied port
>>>>> [ 951.144073] ata5: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>>>>> [ 951.168168] ata5.00: configured for UDMA/100
>>>>> [ 956.168049] ata5.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa0)
>>>>> [ 956.168057] ata5.00: TEST_UNIT_READY failed (err_mask=0x4)
>>>>> [ 956.168061] ata5: limiting SATA link speed to 1.5 Gbps
>>>>> [ 956.168064] ata5.00: limiting speed to UDMA/100:PIO3
>>>>> [ 956.168070] ata5: hard resetting link
>>>>> [ 956.168072] ata5: nv: skipping hardreset on occupied port
>>>>> [ 956.636056] ata5: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>>>>> [ 956.660169] ata5.00: configured for UDMA/100
>>>>> [ 961.660036] ata5.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa0)
>>>>> [ 961.660044] ata5.00: TEST_UNIT_READY failed (err_mask=0x4)
>>>>> [ 961.660046] ata5.00: disabled
>>>>> [ 961.660061] ata5: hard resetting link
>>>>> [ 962.544045] ata5: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
>>>>> [ 962.544061] ata5: EH complete
>>>>>
>>>>> root@teevee:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:06.0/ata1/host0/scsi_host/host0#
>>>>>
>>>> Hmm, it did a hard reset on the hotplug with seemingly the same
>>>> effect. Can we narrow down the problem any more: does this drive work
>>>> on this machine under any Linux version, or in Windows? Can you try it
>>>> in another Linux machine with a different controller to see if it
>>>> works there?
>>> Well, this is embarrassing.
>>>
>>> I've always assumed the problem was with the with the motherboard, as the
>>> DVD will always successfully boot a windows installer, so I assumed
>>> everything with the drive was OK. On further inspection, it appears that the
>>> drive falls down when being accessed from the WinPE environment, much the
>>> same as in linux. I've tested this on another PC and the result looks to be
>>> the same. I'm going to do some more testing, and will send another email if
>>> I find out otherwise. But I think we can consider this closed.
>>>
>>> Sorry to be a bother.
>>> Bruce
>> I hooked up the DVD drive to a USB-SATA adapter to a PC and the DVD drive
>> works great (under both windows and linux). I was able to copy a large
>> number of files with no performance issues.
>> The PC that I did the second test on turns out to have a nVidia MCP51
>> chipset (It's a gateway GT4016 with a KTBC51G-LF motherboard). I should have
>> checked this beforehand.
>>
>> So this problem looks to persist across different nVidia chipsets.
> Given that it fails in Windows as well on those machines, it sounds
> like there's some kind of compatibility issue between this drive and
> the NV chipsets. I don't know why their SATA chipsets (at least the
> pre-AHCI ones) have some many issues, but they do seem to.
I've located a spare HDD and loaded Windows 7 on it. In Windows 7 (not
WinPE), I am able to successfully use the BD-ROM drive on both computers
(MCP61 and MCP51 chipsets). So it appears there is a difference in the
drivers between the Windows 7 and WinPE driver. News to me.
I believe this rules out a general hardware incompatibility.
What further can I do?
Thanks
Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-24 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 22:36 System fails to connect to iHOS-104 DVD drive with nvidia MCP61 chipset Bruce Link
2013-08-14 6:17 ` Robert Hancock
2013-08-14 22:17 ` Bruce Link
2013-08-15 5:36 ` Robert Hancock
2013-08-16 2:47 ` Bruce Link
2013-08-17 17:32 ` Bruce Link
2013-08-18 7:05 ` Robert Hancock
2013-08-24 0:34 ` Bruce Link [this message]
[not found] ` <CADLC3L0wXmVDgHPOFEkeiXD9sDUBg3tZePcJ-gRfoRN5-fXE1w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <52180F76.3070803@1045.ca>
2013-08-24 3:11 ` Robert Hancock
2013-08-24 15:54 ` Bruce Link
[not found] ` <5218D74A.5020305@1045.ca>
2013-09-06 23:17 ` Bruce Link
2013-09-07 1:53 ` Robert Hancock
2013-09-08 12:25 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-18 0:35 ` Bruce Link
2013-09-18 1:40 ` Robert Hancock
2013-09-18 22:27 ` Bruce Link
2013-10-19 0:04 ` Bruce Link
[not found] ` <5261CC95.1050903@1045.ca>
2013-10-22 1:17 ` Robert Hancock
2013-11-09 21:02 ` Bruce Link
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5217FFB2.4050007@1045.ca \
--to=bruce@1045.ca \
--cc=1063474@bugs.launchpad.net \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.