From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 3/3] s390/kprobes: add support for pc-relative long displacement instructions
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:36:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521ABF22.4030903@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377255854-30163-4-git-send-email-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
(2013/08/23 20:04), Heiko Carstens wrote:
> With the general-instruction extension facility (z10) a couple of
> instructions with a pc-relative long displacement were introduced.
> The kprobes support for these instructions however was never implemented.
>
> In result, if anybody ever put a probe on any of these instructions the
> result would have been random behaviour after the instruction got executed
> within the insn slot.
>
> So lets add the missing handling for these instructions. Since all of the
> new instructions have 32 bit signed displacement the easiest solution is
> to allocate an insn slot that is within the same 2GB area like the original
> instruction and patch the displacement field.
>
At least generic kprobes flow looks good for me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kprobes.h | 4 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kprobes.h
> index dcf6948..4176dfe 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kprobes.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
>
> +#define __ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT
> +
> struct pt_regs;
> struct kprobe;
>
> @@ -57,7 +59,7 @@ typedef u16 kprobe_opcode_t;
> /* Architecture specific copy of original instruction */
> struct arch_specific_insn {
> /* copy of original instruction */
> - kprobe_opcode_t insn[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
> + kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
> };
>
> struct prev_kprobe {
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 3388b2b..cb7ac9e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,26 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
>
> struct kretprobe_blackpoint kretprobe_blacklist[] = { };
>
> +DEFINE_INSN_CACHE_OPS(dmainsn);
> +
> +static void *alloc_dmainsn_page(void)
> +{
> + return (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_dmainsn_page(void *page)
> +{
> + free_page((unsigned long)page);
> +}
> +
> +struct kprobe_insn_cache kprobe_dmainsn_slots = {
> + .mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(kprobe_dmainsn_slots.mutex),
> + .alloc = alloc_dmainsn_page,
> + .free = free_dmainsn_page,
> + .pages = LIST_HEAD_INIT(kprobe_dmainsn_slots.pages),
> + .insn_size = MAX_INSN_SIZE,
> +};
> +
> static int __kprobes is_prohibited_opcode(kprobe_opcode_t *insn)
> {
> switch (insn[0] >> 8) {
> @@ -100,9 +120,8 @@ static int __kprobes get_fixup_type(kprobe_opcode_t *insn)
> fixup |= FIXUP_RETURN_REGISTER;
> break;
> case 0xc0:
> - if ((insn[0] & 0x0f) == 0x00 || /* larl */
> - (insn[0] & 0x0f) == 0x05) /* brasl */
> - fixup |= FIXUP_RETURN_REGISTER;
> + if ((insn[0] & 0x0f) == 0x05) /* brasl */
> + fixup |= FIXUP_RETURN_REGISTER;
> break;
> case 0xeb:
> if ((insn[2] & 0xff) == 0x44 || /* bxhg */
> @@ -117,18 +136,128 @@ static int __kprobes get_fixup_type(kprobe_opcode_t *insn)
> return fixup;
> }
>
> +static int __kprobes is_insn_relative_long(kprobe_opcode_t *insn)
> +{
> + /* Check if we have a RIL-b or RIL-c format instruction which
> + * we need to modify in order to avoid instruction emulation. */
> + switch (insn[0] >> 8) {
> + case 0xc0:
> + if ((insn[0] & 0x0f) == 0x00) /* larl */
> + return true;
> + break;
> + case 0xc4:
> + switch (insn[0] & 0x0f) {
> + case 0x02: /* llhrl */
> + case 0x04: /* lghrl */
> + case 0x05: /* lhrl */
> + case 0x06: /* llghrl */
> + case 0x07: /* sthrl */
> + case 0x08: /* lgrl */
> + case 0x0b: /* stgrl */
> + case 0x0c: /* lgfrl */
> + case 0x0d: /* lrl */
> + case 0x0e: /* llgfrl */
> + case 0x0f: /* strl */
> + return true;
> + }
> + break;
> + case 0xc6:
> + switch (insn[0] & 0x0f) {
> + case 0x00: /* exrl */
> + case 0x02: /* pfdrl */
> + case 0x04: /* cghrl */
> + case 0x05: /* chrl */
> + case 0x06: /* clghrl */
> + case 0x07: /* clhrl */
> + case 0x08: /* cgrl */
> + case 0x0a: /* clgrl */
> + case 0x0c: /* cgfrl */
> + case 0x0d: /* crl */
> + case 0x0e: /* clgfrl */
> + case 0x0f: /* clrl */
> + return true;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes copy_instruction(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> + s64 disp, new_disp;
> + u64 addr, new_addr;
> +
> + memcpy(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr, ((p->opcode >> 14) + 3) & -2);
> + if (!is_insn_relative_long(p->ainsn.insn))
> + return;
> + /*
> + * For pc-relative instructions in RIL-b or RIL-c format patch the
> + * RI2 displacement field. We have already made sure that the insn
> + * slot for the patched instruction is within the same 2GB area
> + * as the original instruction (either kernel image or module area).
> + * Therefore the new displacement will always fit.
> + */
> + disp = *(s32 *)&p->ainsn.insn[1];
> + addr = (u64)(unsigned long)p->addr;
> + new_addr = (u64)(unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
> + new_disp = ((addr + (disp * 2)) - new_addr) / 2;
> + *(s32 *)&p->ainsn.insn[1] = new_disp;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_kernel_addr(void *addr)
> +{
> + return addr < (void *)_end;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_module_addr(void *addr)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(MODULES_LEN > (1UL << 31));
> + if (addr < (void *)MODULES_VADDR)
> + return 0;
> + if (addr > (void *)MODULES_END)
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int __kprobes s390_get_insn_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Get an insn slot that is within the same 2GB area like the original
> + * instruction. That way instructions with a 32bit signed displacement
> + * field can be patched and executed within the insn slot.
> + */
> + p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
> + if (is_kernel_addr(p->addr))
> + p->ainsn.insn = get_dmainsn_slot();
> + if (is_module_addr(p->addr))
> + p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
> + return p->ainsn.insn ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes s390_free_insn_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> + if (!p->ainsn.insn)
> + return;
> + if (is_kernel_addr(p->addr))
> + free_dmainsn_slot(p->ainsn.insn, 0);
> + else
> + free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn, 0);
> + p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
> +}
> +
> int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> if ((unsigned long) p->addr & 0x01)
> return -EINVAL;
> -
> /* Make sure the probe isn't going on a difficult instruction */
> if (is_prohibited_opcode(p->addr))
> return -EINVAL;
> -
> + if (s390_get_insn_slot(p))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> p->opcode = *p->addr;
> - memcpy(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr, ((p->opcode >> 14) + 3) & -2);
> -
> + copy_instruction(p);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -169,6 +298,7 @@ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>
> void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> + s390_free_insn_slot(p);
> }
>
> static void __kprobes enable_singlestep(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb,
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-26 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-23 11:04 [PATCH v2 0/3] kprobes: add new dma insn slot cache for s390 Heiko Carstens
2013-08-23 11:04 ` [Patch v2 1/3] kprobes: unify insn caches Heiko Carstens
2013-08-26 1:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-08-23 11:04 ` [Patch v2 2/3] kprobes: allow to specify custum allocator for " Heiko Carstens
2013-08-26 2:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-08-23 11:04 ` [Patch v2 3/3] s390/kprobes: add support for pc-relative long displacement instructions Heiko Carstens
2013-08-26 2:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521ABF22.4030903@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.