From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: ptrace.h: remove ptrace_peeksiginfo_args
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:08:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521AD4CE.2020907@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377487515-26654-2-git-send-email-bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
On 08/25/2013 08:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> The addition of ptrace_peeksiginfo_args to the uapi in kernel commit
> 84c751bd [ptrace: add ability to retrieve signals without removing from a queue (v4)]
> means that existing applications using glibc versions that define ptrace_peeksiginfo_args
> in sys/ptrace.h will get duplicate structure definitions like:
>
> | In file included from /poky-master/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/strace/4.8-r0/strace-4.8/process.c:66:0:
> | /poky-master/build/tmp/sysroots/qemux86/usr/include/linux/ptrace.h:58:8: error: redefinition of 'struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args'
> | struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args {
> | ^
> | In file included from /poky-master/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/strace/4.8-r0/strace-4.8/defs.h:159:0,
> | from /poky-master/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/strace/4.8-r0/strace-4.8/process.c:37:
> | /poky-master/build/tmp/sysroots/qemux86/usr/include/sys/ptrace.h:191:8: note: originally defined here
> | struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args
> | ^
> | make[2]: *** [process.o] Error 1
>
> Reverting to the previous status of not exporting this structure temporarily
> fixes applications, until they can be adjusted to not mix sys/ptrace.h and
> linux/ptrace.h includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
> ---
> ...1-ptrace.h-remove-ptrace_peeksiginfo_args.patch | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++
> .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.10.bb | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers/0001-ptrace.h-remove-ptrace_peeksiginfo_args.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers/0001-ptrace.h-remove-ptrace_peeksiginfo_args.patch b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers/0001-ptrace.h-remove-ptrace_peeksiginfo_args.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..da2e117
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers/0001-ptrace.h-remove-ptrace_peeksiginfo_args.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +From 7dddfb8fec5317ea16154d30e8e18b6559979b60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
> +Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:51:07 -0400
> +Subject: [PATCH] ptrace.h: remove ptrace_peeksiginfo_args
> +
> +The addition of ptrace_peeksiginfo_args to the uapi in kernel commit
> +84c751bd [ptrace: add ability to retrieve signals without removing from a queue (v4)]
> +means that existing applications using glibc versions that define ptrace_peeksiginfo_args
> +in sys/ptrace.h will get duplicate structure definitions like:
> +
> + | In file included from /poky-master/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/strace/4.8-r0/strace-4.8/process.c:66:0:
> + | /poky-master/build/tmp/sysroots/qemux86/usr/include/linux/ptrace.h:58:8: error: redefinition of 'struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args'
> + | struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args {
> + | ^
> + | In file included from /poky-master/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/strace/4.8-r0/strace-4.8/defs.h:159:0,
> + | from /poky-master/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/strace/4.8-r0/strace-4.8/process.c:37:
> + | /poky-master/build/tmp/sysroots/qemux86/usr/include/sys/ptrace.h:191:8: note: originally defined here
> + | struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args
> + | ^
> + | make[2]: *** [process.o] Error 1
> +
> +Reverting to the previous status of not exporting this structure temporarily
> +fixes applications, until they can be adjusted to not mix sys/ptrace.h and
> +linux/ptrace.h includes.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Just for the record, it has no Upstream-Status, I know how much you
dislike upstream status and just how inappropriate this patch is!
I will put this in MUT so we can move forward tonight.
Thanks
Sau!
> +---
> + include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h | 6 ------
> + 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h
> +index 52ebcc8..524599d 100644
> +--- a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h
> ++++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h
> +@@ -55,12 +55,6 @@
> +
> + #define PTRACE_PEEKSIGINFO 0x4209
> +
> +-struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args {
> +- __u64 off; /* from which siginfo to start */
> +- __u32 flags;
> +- __s32 nr; /* how may siginfos to take */
> +-};
> +-
> + /* Read signals from a shared (process wide) queue */
> + #define PTRACE_PEEKSIGINFO_SHARED (1 << 0)
> +
> +--
> +1.7.10.4
> +
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.10.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.10.bb
> index eb04367..b2e6f0f 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.10.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.10.bb
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> require linux-libc-headers.inc
>
> -PR = "r0"
> +SRC_URI += "file://0001-ptrace.h-remove-ptrace_peeksiginfo_args.patch"
>
> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "72d0a9b3e60cd86fabcd3f24b1708944"
> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "46c9e55e1fddf40813b8d697d5645037a8e2af5c1a8dff52b3fe82b5021582b8"
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-26 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-26 3:25 linux-libc-headers: fix 3.10 build issues Bruce Ashfield
2013-08-26 3:25 ` [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: ptrace.h: remove ptrace_peeksiginfo_args Bruce Ashfield
2013-08-26 4:08 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2013-08-26 4:26 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-08-26 11:03 ` Richard Purdie
2013-08-26 12:39 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-08-26 13:18 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521AD4CE.2020907@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.