From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: [RFC] cleanup mach-s5p* Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:54:59 +0200 Message-ID: <521B4213.8040601@samsung.com> References: <1f7b01cea1f6$9560aa10$c021fe30$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:37982 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751524Ab3HZLzE (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 07:55:04 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MS400M4EZQ30G90@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:55:01 +0100 (BST) In-reply-to: <1f7b01cea1f6$9560aa10$c021fe30$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'linux-samsung-soc' , 'Kyungmin Park' , =?UTF-8?B?IlRvbWFzeiBGaWdhLw==?= =?UTF-8?B?U1JQT0wtS2VybmVsICYgU3lzdGVtIEZyYW1ld29yayAoU1NEKS8uL+yCvOyEseyghA==?= =?UTF-8?B?7J6QIg==?= , =?UTF-8?B?IlN5bHdlc3RlciBOYXdy?= =?UTF-8?B?b2NraS9TUlBPTC1LZXJuZWwgJiBTeXN0ZW0gRnJhbWV3b3JrIChTU0QpLy4v7IK8?= =?UTF-8?B?7ISx7KCE7J6QIg==?= , m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com Hi Kukjin, On 8/26/2013 2:52 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a plan to remove supporting following SoCs in mainline in the near > future. > - s5pc100 - smdkc100 > - s5pv210(s5c110) - aquial, goni, smdkc110, smdkv210, torbreck > - s5p64x0(s5p6440, s5p6450)- smdk6440, smdk6450 > > I think users don't seem to use that any more with mainline. If so, we are > able to consider, it is not right now though. > > How do you think? I am against removing support for S5PC110/S5PV210. We still use it for some of our internal development. DT support patches will be posted soon (pinctrl and clocks). Support for S5PC100 can be easily added the same way (we also have DT patches almost ready). S5PV210, S5PC100 and the older S3C64xx can all be handled by the same Samsung-DT 'machine file'. However we don't have any s5p64x0 based boards to develop DT support for them. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung R&D Institute Poland From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski) Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:54:59 +0200 Subject: [RFC] cleanup mach-s5p* In-Reply-To: <1f7b01cea1f6$9560aa10$c021fe30$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1f7b01cea1f6$9560aa10$c021fe30$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <521B4213.8040601@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Kukjin, On 8/26/2013 2:52 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a plan to remove supporting following SoCs in mainline in the near > future. > - s5pc100 - smdkc100 > - s5pv210(s5c110) - aquial, goni, smdkc110, smdkv210, torbreck > - s5p64x0(s5p6440, s5p6450)- smdk6440, smdk6450 > > I think users don't seem to use that any more with mainline. If so, we are > able to consider, it is not right now though. > > How do you think? I am against removing support for S5PC110/S5PV210. We still use it for some of our internal development. DT support patches will be posted soon (pinctrl and clocks). Support for S5PC100 can be easily added the same way (we also have DT patches almost ready). S5PV210, S5PC100 and the older S3C64xx can all be handled by the same Samsung-DT 'machine file'. However we don't have any s5p64x0 based boards to develop DT support for them. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung R&D Institute Poland