From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] linux/vnuma: Enables NUMA support for PV guest Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:35:18 +0100 Message-ID: <521CAB16.6000308@citrix.com> References: <1377593580-10040-1-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com> <1377593580-10040-3-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1377593580-10040-3-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Elena Ufimtseva Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 27/08/13 09:53, Elena Ufimtseva wrote: > Enables NUMA support for PV guest and uses vNUMA > interface to discover topology provided by XEN. > > Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva > --- > arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c > index 056d11f..7e0c93b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c > @@ -561,6 +561,6 @@ void __init xen_arch_setup(void) > WARN_ON(xen_set_default_idle()); > fiddle_vdso(); > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > - numa_off = 1; > + numa_off = 0; > #endif > } Hmm. This is either safe to turn on now or it will break on hosts without vNUMA support as it will cause a fallback to try all the hardware specific NUMA initialization. Which is it? David