From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governors: Remove duplicate check of target freq in supported range
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:46:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521CC9B8.2020801@semaphore.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=xBmpEv=oN1qEnq9RKhfjtc4wZayVYyVzjWOU8BnwVJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/27/2013 08:57 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 August 2013 00:07, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ----
>
> Get rid of few more checks..
>
> /* if we are already at full speed then break out early */
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq == policy->max)
> return;
>
>
> /*
> * if we cannot reduce the frequency anymore, break out early
> */
> if (policy->cur == policy->min)
> return;
>
I think we should keep these checks because:
1) They shorten the execution code (there is no unnecessary call of
__cpufreq_driver_target)
2) In case my patch will be accepted, we need them to avoid continuously
increase of dbs_info->requested_freq.With my patch the requested_freq
can temporarily overcome policy->min and policy->max. __cpufreq_driver_target
will select the correct frequency (within policy->min and policy->max).
Then, dbs_cpufreq_notifier will adjust requested_freq.
I hope the logic in 2) to be acceptable.
Thanks,
Stratos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-26 18:37 [PATCH] cpufreq: governors: Remove duplicate check of target freq in supported range Stratos Karafotis
2013-08-27 5:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-27 15:46 ` Stratos Karafotis [this message]
2013-08-27 16:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-27 17:34 ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-08-28 5:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-28 5:35 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521CC9B8.2020801@semaphore.gr \
--to=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.