From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Juan Casse <jcasse@chromium.org>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>, fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Adds check for numberio during verify phase.
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:02:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521CDBC2.8050705@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377552162-31741-1-git-send-email-jcasse@chromium.org>
On 08/26/2013 03:22 PM, Juan Casse wrote:
> We check numberio to detect stale blocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Casse <jcasse@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>
> ---
> HOWTO | 7 +++++++
> init.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ioengine.h | 1 +
> iolog.c | 1 +
> iolog.h | 1 +
> libfio.c | 3 ++-
> options.c | 9 +++++++++
> thread_options.h | 2 ++
> verify.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 9 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/HOWTO b/HOWTO
> index 005dac2..14ff8b5 100644
> --- a/HOWTO
> +++ b/HOWTO
> @@ -657,6 +657,13 @@ ioengine=str Defines how the job issues io to the file. The following
> filename, eg ioengine=external:/tmp/foo.o
> to load ioengine foo.o in /tmp.
>
> +data_integrity_check
> + If this option is given, fio will check the i/o number of
> + each block read back during the verification phase. Fio
> + checks numberio to detect stale blocks. Currently, this
> + option requires synchronous i/o, and equal-sized read and
> + write blocks. This option requires workloads that write data.
I think this use case is just too narrow. Why does it require sync IO
and equal read/write sizes? Can't you just replay and re-generate and
compare?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-26 21:22 [PATCH 1/2] Adds check for numberio during verify phase Juan Casse
2013-08-26 21:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] Adds check for rand_seed " Juan Casse
2013-08-26 22:11 ` Grant Grundler
2013-08-27 17:02 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-27 17:25 ` Grant Grundler
2013-08-28 7:14 ` Erwan Velu
2013-08-31 4:31 ` Jens Axboe
2013-09-02 8:38 ` Erwan Velu
2013-09-03 22:38 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-27 17:02 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2013-08-27 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Adds check for numberio " Grant Grundler
2013-08-27 17:50 ` Juan Casse
2013-08-27 18:44 ` Juan Casse
2013-08-27 20:48 ` Juan Casse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-04 1:10 Juan Casse
2013-09-04 1:14 Juan Casse
2013-09-04 1:15 Juan Casse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521CDBC2.8050705@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grundler@chromium.org \
--cc=jcasse@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.