From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:33:02 +0100 Message-ID: <521E182E.1050707@citrix.com> References: <521DD85B02000078000EF03F@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <521E211202000078000EF193@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <21022.4552.769460.236765@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <521E31B402000078000EF2B1@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <21022.5685.589289.319751@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VEhk4-0007uP-Np for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:33:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: <21022.5685.589289.319751@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel , Boris Ostrovsky , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 28/08/13 16:24, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass"): >> On 28.08.13 at 17:05, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> If you point me at something else to use as input to the push gate I >>> would be happy to use that. >> >> I guess the kernel maintainers are in a better position to point out >> the most stable tree/branch to follow for that purpose. > > Is there a single branch or tag that always corresponds to the > "current stable kernel" ? Or do we have to update this every n months ? No. Each stable series has its own branch. I would recommend using the 3.10.y stable tree which is the current longterm stable tree. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git branch: linux-3.10.y David