From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEhmX-0000Tn-Ho for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:35:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEhmS-0007fm-5B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:35:41 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49197 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEhmR-0007fe-S4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:35:36 -0400 Message-ID: <521E18C4.2050308@suse.de> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:35:32 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1377103508-13496-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <521E1510.9090804@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu/arm-devs] hw/cpu/a15mpcore: Use qemu_get_cpu() for generic timers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Cornelia Huck , Alexander Graf , QEMU Developers , Paul Brook Am 28.08.2013 17:22, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 28 August 2013 16:19, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Am 21.08.2013 18:45, schrieb Andreas F=C3=A4rber: >>> This simplifies the loop and aids with refactoring of CPU list. >>> >>> Requested-by: Peter Maydell >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber >>> --- >>> hw/cpu/a15mpcore.c | 5 ++--- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> Seeing no objection or pick-up from PMM I've applied this to qom-cpu >> now, to move forward with CPU list refactoring. >=20 > I wasn't sure how this patch fit with your larger series > that redoes the a15mpcore/gic/etc (which I think I'm > still waiting for an applyable patch set so I can review > it); I think I thought it was an apply-afterwards thing. This one needs to go before my qom-cpu-12 series to avoid the CPU loop ugliness. That's in my CPU tree, and seeing no objections I still need to test the p_greetings2.c sample for the CPU-removed case in linux-user and will then merge that before we get more CPU loops. For the MPCore series in my ARM/Tegra tree you wanted an assert for object_initialize(). I am waiting for you to comment on my more invasive/complete series (last part being optional), which would then with any suggested changes go through my QOM tree before I add more uses of object_initialize() that would need to be converted. Based on that I will respin the MPCore, virtio and other QOM series. > Anyway, I have no objection to it. Thanks, want me to add some *-by? Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg