From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <521E42F2.2090707@linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:35:30 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zubair Lutfullah : CC: jic23@cam.ac.uk, lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: ti_am335x_adc: Add continuous sampling support References: <1377470724-15710-1-git-send-email-zubair.lutfullah@gmail.com> <1377470724-15710-3-git-send-email-zubair.lutfullah@gmail.com> <20130828164308.GE14111@linutronix.de> <20130828181951.GA3580@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130828181951.GA3580@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-ID: On 08/28/2013 08:19 PM, Zubair Lutfullah : wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:43:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> * Zubair Lutfullah | 2013-08-25 23:45:24 [+0100]: >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c >>> index a952538..ae2202b 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c >>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c >>> @@ -231,28 +406,56 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> … >>> +err_free_device: >>> + iio_device_free(indio_dev); >> >> I am not sure about this one. > > If I understand correctly, if devm_iio_device_alloc > is successful earlier in the code and subsequent stuff fails. > > Then the code jumps to err_free_device and this is needed. Yes, but devm_() helper release the memory on failer _or_ device / driver removal. >>> +err_ret: >>> return err; >>> } >>> >>> @@ -262,11 +465,14 @@ static int tiadc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev); >>> u32 step_en; >>> >>> + free_irq(adc_dev->irq, indio_dev); >>> iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); >>> + iio_buffer_unregister(indio_dev); >>> tiadc_channels_remove(indio_dev); >>> >>> step_en = get_adc_step_mask(adc_dev); >>> am335x_tsc_se_clr(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc, step_en); >>> + iio_device_free(indio_dev); >> >> But this one is wrong. The will be removed via dev_res() and if you do >> it here as well then dev_res() will decrement the reference of an unused >> object. > I was unaware of this aspect. > > *but* > > iio_simple_dummy.c has it in its remove function. > And I just checked and found it in several drivers as well. > > I'll leave this to the more experienced folks on the list.. You can belive me one thing or the other :) Point me one driver please. Do they use devm_iio_device_alloc() like you do or iio_device_alloc()? In case of the latter you need to manually free the memory. >>> >>> return 0; >>> } Sebastian