From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] OMAPDSS: use new display drivers Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:26:21 +0300 Message-ID: <521EE98D.9070209@ti.com> References: <521DAC2B.4080100@ti.com> <20130829061923.GM7656@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SIIHqQpu3OeUnurbFnc0aUqf66tjgk6be" Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:51582 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752825Ab3H2G0s (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 02:26:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130829061923.GM7656@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap , linux-arm-kernel , Kevin Hilman , Olof Johansson --SIIHqQpu3OeUnurbFnc0aUqf66tjgk6be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/08/13 09:19, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tomi Valkeinen [130828 00:59]: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a pull request for the board file changes to take the new displ= ay >> drivers into use. >=20 > OK great. > =20 >> If there's an "early" pull request going to Linus during the merge win= dow, it'd >> be nice to have these in that request. That would give me time to send= a pull >> request to Linus containing removal of the old, no longer used, driver= s. >=20 > Nice to see that this is not conflicting with anything in linux next :)= Did you add the series to your for-next branch? > I suggest you keep this branch immutable in case it need to be merged t= o arm-soc > tree, and merge it yourself along with the DSS patches. That way you I do feel a bit uneasy with merging lots of arch changes via fbdev tree, but yes, I guess I can do that. Is that an "ack" from you for all the patches? If I do merge it via fbdev, I want to have at least acked-by in the commits. If that was an ack, I'll add them, but it means I need to update the branch. > don't have a dependency to arm-soc for removal of the old drivers. The dependency is run-time dependency, so the removal series does not need to be based on this. As long as this series is merged first, things should work. Tomi --SIIHqQpu3OeUnurbFnc0aUqf66tjgk6be Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSHumNAAoJEPo9qoy8lh71kpIP/jxFrnfY3AfP7pXsYX/VESTI lnccv92DAcdrS/Y0MyuK8m7O+Tggikp5koFOxJWeCvieAHCiplRKMXsFCu0NMnD8 XpIFln3fg8djDQVeZ7L0IoHLmmukp1AEHUgnjaTqjVSOl4u3/fl6DdO7dQEuutna 0BeKzRdjJX8F+nnuhYxSR2VRO+43PZ2PeT0/6Z1AUthF+WLYHvYimSWQp0Z3mrze iyvxmD63GIu9rX95eb2HfeQvGri4TeQTcIeKAnuEOFRcMxl6xlCibacYCHLcYnoM 3fGWQz6YiqNeEsWN/Doa4s5xotxMjHMKrOYXx0No08XWK5VMbT2okAQjYLVI1X4P UzERh56HGyfL7/5/rGWt422iOY4rlzlcHoEQV6o2uOzSBDD2+aTaM195wpys19rq ddReXuAv2Rhgkuyk0HIG60LO+RgopGxH5Ky/kxqAxTppDvLIcWrNVg+BC19OlzMj +9e26SzY+6JRYh+tLh6lC4ohzMpaZSeG0dMG9IiljjGdozzLyEnMMxtcQ5NNs6Yv 9ut1yKYF1FrGAFGZX/lP77DZg211yiGP4POfH/qSgawAW/J/UzUU1bxr/ig2v7tn XJZFegNS228kMtNto35pBgM8wMu0TwcRIjSE6MyVJ3s/JOmR/R3HIejPT+oeJZ1L VAQjA7v7JtzrA2IBq4x9 =YF59 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SIIHqQpu3OeUnurbFnc0aUqf66tjgk6be-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:26:21 +0300 Subject: [GIT PULL] OMAPDSS: use new display drivers In-Reply-To: <20130829061923.GM7656@atomide.com> References: <521DAC2B.4080100@ti.com> <20130829061923.GM7656@atomide.com> Message-ID: <521EE98D.9070209@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 29/08/13 09:19, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tomi Valkeinen [130828 00:59]: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a pull request for the board file changes to take the new display >> drivers into use. > > OK great. > >> If there's an "early" pull request going to Linus during the merge window, it'd >> be nice to have these in that request. That would give me time to send a pull >> request to Linus containing removal of the old, no longer used, drivers. > > Nice to see that this is not conflicting with anything in linux next :) Did you add the series to your for-next branch? > I suggest you keep this branch immutable in case it need to be merged to arm-soc > tree, and merge it yourself along with the DSS patches. That way you I do feel a bit uneasy with merging lots of arch changes via fbdev tree, but yes, I guess I can do that. Is that an "ack" from you for all the patches? If I do merge it via fbdev, I want to have at least acked-by in the commits. If that was an ack, I'll add them, but it means I need to update the branch. > don't have a dependency to arm-soc for removal of the old drivers. The dependency is run-time dependency, so the removal series does not need to be based on this. As long as this series is merged first, things should work. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 901 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: