All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] aio: add aio_context_acquire() and aio_context_release()
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:26:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F05B7.9000203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377614385-20466-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>

Il 27/08/2013 16:39, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> +void aio_context_acquire(AioContext *ctx)
> +{
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&ctx->acquire_lock);
> +    while (ctx->owner) {
> +        assert(!qemu_thread_is_self(ctx->owner));
> +        aio_notify(ctx); /* kick current owner */
> +        qemu_cond_wait(&ctx->acquire_cond, &ctx->acquire_lock);
> +    }
> +    qemu_thread_get_self(&ctx->owner_thread);
> +    ctx->owner = &ctx->owner_thread;
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&ctx->acquire_lock);
> +}
> +
> +void aio_context_release(AioContext *ctx)
> +{
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&ctx->acquire_lock);
> +    assert(ctx->owner && qemu_thread_is_self(ctx->owner));
> +    ctx->owner = NULL;
> +    qemu_cond_signal(&ctx->acquire_cond);
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&ctx->acquire_lock);
> +}

Thinking more about it, there is a risk of busy waiting here if one
thread releases the AioContext and tries to acquire it again (as in the
common case of one thread doing acquire/poll/release in a loop).  It
would only work if mutexes guarantee some level of fairness.

If you implement recursive acquisition, however, you can make aio_poll
acquire the context up until just before it invokes ppoll, and then
again after it comes back from the ppoll.  The two acquire/release pair
will be no-ops if called during "synchronous" I/O such as

  /* Another thread */
  aio_context_acquire(ctx);
  bdrv_read(bs, 0x1000, buf, 1);
  aio_context_release(ctx);

Yet they will do the right thing when called from the event loop thread.

(where the bdrv_read can actually be something more complicated such as
a live snapshot or, in general, anything involving bdrv_drain_all).

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-29  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-27 14:39 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] aio: add aio_context_acquire() and aio_context_release() Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-27 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-28  2:41   ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-27 18:33 ` Alex Bligh
2013-08-28  3:25 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-28  8:49   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-29  1:09     ` Wenchao Xia
2013-08-29  7:43       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-09-10 19:42         ` Michael Roth
2013-09-12  8:11           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-29  8:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-08-30  9:22   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-30 13:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-30 14:25       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-08-30  4:02 ` Wenchao Xia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=521F05B7.9000203@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.