From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <521F3F1F.4020505@aaton.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:31:27 +0200 From: Nicolas Pinault MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Virtualization with Xenomai List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Hello, Le 29/08/2013 13:06, Asier Tamayo Arbide a =E9crit : > Hello all, > > My embedded system has two boards running Linux: one runs the user > interface and the other one the critical real-time tasks. Both boards are > running Xenomai on an Atom N270 chipset. > > > > Now, I am planning to compact my system in just one board and have two > options. The first one is to execute everything using Xenomai and the > second one is to port my user interface to Windows and to run both Windows > and Xenomai on top of a hypervisor. My e-mail regards this second option. > > > > I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this. Is the > real-time response affected in any way when using a hypervisor? My current > kernel has been compiled using the ELinOS Embedded Linux distribution. Do= I > have to patch it? > > > > I am studying Xen, VmWare, KVM and Enea. Do you recommend any of them? The > board I=92ll use in the new (compact) system will support virtualization > extensions (Intel VT). > In Windows world, use RTX :=20 http://www.intervalzero.com/products/rtx-rtx64/overview/ > > Thank you for your help. Best regards, > > > > Ata > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai mailing list > Xenomai@xenomai.org > http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai >