From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VF2gX-0004eS-25 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:54:53 +0000 Message-ID: <521F5297.4070906@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:54:31 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, apic: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP References: <20130829092458.5476.10277.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> In-Reply-To: <20130829092458.5476.10277.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: HATAYAMA Daisuke Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jingbai.ma@hp.com On 08/29/2013 02:27 AM, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > This is the patch series to address the issue that kdump 2nd kernel > now fails to wake up multiple CPUs. Please explain the "now" in the above sentence. Is this a regression? If so, what is its impact? Is this something that needs to go into 3.11 as a post-rc7 change, which means it better be hyper-critical? -hpa _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754584Ab3H2Nyd (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:54:33 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:10036 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753862Ab3H2Nyc (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:54:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,983,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="393958504" Message-ID: <521F5297.4070906@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:54:31 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HATAYAMA Daisuke CC: ebiederm@xmission.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jingbai.ma@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, apic: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP References: <20130829092458.5476.10277.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> In-Reply-To: <20130829092458.5476.10277.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/29/2013 02:27 AM, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > This is the patch series to address the issue that kdump 2nd kernel > now fails to wake up multiple CPUs. Please explain the "now" in the above sentence. Is this a regression? If so, what is its impact? Is this something that needs to go into 3.11 as a post-rc7 change, which means it better be hyper-critical? -hpa