From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <alex.elder@linaro.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rbd: close remove vs. notify race leading to use-after-free
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:33:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F9408.4020301@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521F6716.1020000@linaro.org>
On 08/29/2013 08:21 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 01:24 AM, Josh Durgin wrote:
>> Removing a device deallocates the disk, unschedules the watch, and
>> finally cleans up the rbd_dev structure. rbd_dev_refresh(), called
>> from the watch callback, updates the disk size and rbd_dev
>> structure. With no locking between them, rbd_dev_refresh() may use the
>> device or rbd_dev after they've been freed.
>>
>> To fix this, use the header_rwsem to protect all the work
>> rbd_dev_refresh() does, and take it exclusively in rbd_remove() where
>> the block device is released and the watch is canceled.
>
> It seems to me this was a little bit of a tricky area. As I recall
> there was a problem related to lock inversion, holding the semaphore
> while calling revalidate_disk(). (I'm sorry, this may be wrong and
> I can't dig much into it further at the moment.) In any case, make
> sure you test with lockdep enabled and look for splats to the console.
You're right, there was a lock inversion with the header_rwsem and
bdev->bd_mutex. I'll switch to using a new mutex to avoid this.
> Also, there was once a function rbd_update_mapping_size(),
> which encapsulated both updating the size field and then
> calling set_capacity() immediately thereafter. When images
> were refreshed (in rbd_dev_vX_refresh()), these updates would
> be made by calling rbd_update_mapping_size(). That made good
> sense, but after this commit:
> 00a653e216 rbd: update capacity in rbd_dev_refresh()
> the function became pretty trivial and it got removed.
>
> I think due to the lockdep thing, revalidate_disk() was
> later called outside the protection of the mutex. It may
> be necessary to at least move those size updates back into
> the refresh functions to resolve the lockdep problem.
>
> Anyway, having a function that encapsulates these size changes
> like before might be nice, but it's not that important. If
> there really is a problem with calling revalidate_disk() with
> the mutex held, then it's not all done in a single unit anyway.
Good idea.
>> rbd_bus_del_dev() ends up releasing the block device, so no requests
>> to the device remain after this. This makes all the work in
>> rbd_dev_refresh() unnecessary, as well as race-prone, so skip it if
>> the watch has been canceled.
>
> This makes sense, but a brief comment explaining why you're
> skipping it at the point in the code would be helpful.
I'll add one. Thanks!
Josh
>> Finally, flush the osd client's notify queue before deallocating the
>> rbd dev, so that any callbacks remaining can read rbd_dev->watch_event
>> safely. No more notifies can enter the queue at this point since the
>> watch has been canceled.
>>
>> Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5636
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
>
> Please verify there's no lockdep reports if you haven't already.
> And consider my other comments, but barring lockdep issues:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/rbd.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> index fef3687..63e1590 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> @@ -3327,10 +3327,13 @@ static void rbd_exists_validate(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
>> static int rbd_dev_refresh(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
>> {
>> u64 mapping_size;
>> - int ret;
>> + int ret = 0;
>>
>> rbd_assert(rbd_image_format_valid(rbd_dev->image_format));
>> down_write(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
>> + if (!rbd_dev->watch_event)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> mapping_size = rbd_dev->mapping.size;
>> if (rbd_dev->image_format == 1)
>> ret = rbd_dev_v1_header_info(rbd_dev);
>> @@ -3340,7 +3343,6 @@ static int rbd_dev_refresh(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
>> /* If it's a mapped snapshot, validate its EXISTS flag */
>>
>> rbd_exists_validate(rbd_dev);
>> - up_write(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
>>
>> if (mapping_size != rbd_dev->mapping.size) {
>> sector_t size;
>> @@ -3350,7 +3352,8 @@ static int rbd_dev_refresh(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
>> set_capacity(rbd_dev->disk, size);
>> revalidate_disk(rbd_dev->disk);
>> }
>> -
>> +out:
>> + up_write(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -5159,10 +5162,26 @@ static ssize_t rbd_remove(struct bus_type *bus,
>> if (ret < 0 || already)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * take header semaphore while destroying the device and
>> + * canceling the watch so that device destruction will
>> + * not race with device updates from the watch callback
>> + */
>> + down_write(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
>> rbd_bus_del_dev(rbd_dev);
>> ret = rbd_dev_header_watch_sync(rbd_dev, false);
>> + up_write(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
>> +
>> if (ret)
>> rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "failed to cancel watch event (%d)\n", ret);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * flush remaing watch callbacks - these don't update anything
>> + * anymore since rbd_dev->watch_event is NULL, but it avoids
>> + * the watch callback using a freed rbd_dev
>> + */
>> + dout("%s: flushing notifies", __func__);
>> + ceph_osdc_flush_notifies(&rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc);
>> rbd_dev_image_release(rbd_dev);
>> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 6:24 [PATCH 0/3] shutdown race and debug fix Josh Durgin
2013-08-29 6:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] rbd: fix null dereference in dout Josh Durgin
2013-08-29 14:26 ` Alex Elder
2013-08-29 14:46 ` Sage Weil
2013-08-29 6:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] libceph: add function to ensure notifies are complete Josh Durgin
2013-08-29 14:46 ` Sage Weil
2013-08-29 15:21 ` Alex Elder
2013-08-29 6:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] rbd: close remove vs. notify race leading to use-after-free Josh Durgin
2013-08-29 14:46 ` Sage Weil
2013-08-29 18:36 ` Josh Durgin
2013-08-29 15:21 ` Alex Elder
2013-08-29 18:33 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
2013-08-30 0:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rbd: fix use-after free of rbd_dev->disk Josh Durgin
2013-09-03 12:41 ` Alex Elder
2013-09-09 7:30 ` Josh Durgin
2013-08-30 0:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rbd: complete notifies before cleaning up osd_client and rbd_dev Josh Durgin
2013-09-03 12:45 ` Alex Elder
2013-08-30 0:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rbd: make rbd_obj_notify_ack() synchronous Josh Durgin
2013-09-03 13:05 ` Alex Elder
2013-09-03 13:07 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521F9408.4020301@inktank.com \
--to=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
--cc=alex.elder@linaro.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.